Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br />Staff stated the site is almost completely in agriculture at this time, excepting the area <br />immediately surrounding the existing house and outbuildings and the pond/drainage area <br />at the southeastern corner of the property. <br />Staff noted that while the property is Rural, development is likely at some point in time <br />once utilities become available — post 2010, since this is a Stage 2 Growth Area. As a <br />result, ensuring that lot dimension requirements are maintained now will help safeguard <br />the availability of utilities for that future development. For example, future utility <br />availability to the area north of the proposed home site may be put at risk, as there is <br />diminished area for road access. Further, as utility availability is often financially <br />feasible only when shared among a group of property owners, limiting future <br />development may limit future utility availability. <br />With respect to minimum lot requirements, sta ` tat` <br />in a Rural zone is ten acres. Both parcels wo eet <br />imum lot size for property <br />eme t. <br />Staff noted the minimum lot width for property <br />defined in the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance as' <br />lot line of a lot measured at the building setb <br />Additionally, the Subdivision Ordinance <br />shall abut for their full frontage on a p <br />al zone 4`feet. Lot width is <br />o. tal distance between the side <br />aMel to the front lot line.,, <br />6, requires that "all lots <br />ed street." <br />Staff indicated Parcel A, at 221.6 ft does <br />and as a result the applicant is as or a <br />lot width, then, Parcel A also +t fulfill <br />road. <br />With respect to <br />3.B.1.b. requ <br />Both parce1" <br />in the far sou <br />With respect to septi <br />parcel is capable of acco <br />for both primary and second <br />e minimum lot width requirement, <br />ith less than the required 330' of <br />uirement of having full frontage on a <br />o Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. <br />acres or more to have at least 20% upland area. <br />there are wetlands and/or drainage easements only <br />posed 18- acre parcel. <br />noted soils tests confirm that the proposed 11 -acre <br />ting a septic system. In addition, there is adequate room <br />sites. The 18- acre parcel already contains a septic <br />system, with adequate room for a secondary site. <br />With respect to access issues, staff indicated the existing 29 -acre parcel contains an <br />access drive onto Ash Street. A second access drive will be required for the proposed 11- <br />acre parcel. As Ash Street is a County road, plans have been forwarded to the Anoka <br />County Highway Department for review and approval. <br />Staff reviewed the five findings for variance as follows. <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />