Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />Lindahl Minor Subdivision & Variance <br />September 11, 2002 <br />Comment: The proposed action would not be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Ordinance, as Variances are to be granted only in cases where <br />hardship /unique physical circumstances are present. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The proposed Minor Subdivision would result in two lots: Tract B would have a width of <br />155 feet, thus not meeting the minimum lot width requirement of 330' for property in a <br />Rural zone, nor the requirement of full frontage on a road; Tract A would have 330' of <br />width and road frontage, but it would not be contiguous width or frontage. Alternate <br />configurations presented by the applicant meet the minimum lot width/road frontage, but <br />do not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 10 acres. As a result, staff cannot <br />recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision. <br />As there are no hardship issues or unique circumstances apparent on the property, staff <br />cannot recommend approval of a Variance from the lot width requirements. <br />OPTIONS <br />1.) Recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision and Variance. <br />2.) Recommend denial of the Minor Subdivision and Variance. <br />3.) Return to staff with direction. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Option #2 <br />