Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 7 <br />Staff presented its analysis by explaining the Certificate of Survey shows the proposed <br />division of the 11 -acre parcel. Tract B, one acre, contains the Lindahl home and <br />outbuildings, of which .89 acres are upland; Tract A, ten acres, contains the balance of <br />the property, of which four acres are upland. <br />With respect to lot size, staff stated the minimum lot size for property in a Rural zone is <br />ten acres. The proposed newly created lot would meet this requirement, with the balance <br />of the property consisting of the one -acre parcel, as allowed under Section 3, <br />subd.3 .A.2 .b.2. <br />With respect to lot width, staff noted the minimum lot width for property in a Rural zone <br />is 330 feet. Lot width is defined as "the horizontal distance between the side lot line of a <br />lot measured at the building setback line and paralleltfront lot line." Additionally, <br />the Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance, Section:. 01 , div. 6, requires that "all lots <br />shall abut for their full frontage on a publical <br />Staff stated Tract B, at 155 feet, does not meet <br />as a result, the applicant is asking for a Varian <br />width, then, Tract B also does not fulfill the re <br />road. <br />requirement, and <br />than the required 330' of lot <br />wing full frontage on a <br />Staff indicated Tract A is an irregularly <br />minimum lot width requirement irtemsof <br />re pare <br />one acre <br />") lot that does not meet the <br />contiguous road width and road frontage. <br />-269 feet to the west of the one acre <br />Thus, although the proposed lot has <br />Rather, the lot wraps around the o <br />parcel and 188 feet to the east c <br />330' of width on a road, it is n <br />With respect to <br />3.B.1.b requi <br />20% upland. <br />of upland, all <br />parcel is almost <br />ous width. <br />cels requh <br />Both parcels <br />'s upland <br />o Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. <br />zm of 10 acres or more to have a minimum of <br />this requirement: the 10 -acre parcel has four acres <br />s as "islands" among wetland area, and the one acre <br />of upland. <br />With respect to septic isSues:aff stated soils tests confirm that the proposed 10 -acre <br />parcel is capable of accomrrtdating a septic system. In addition, there is adequate room <br />for both primary and secondary sites. The one -acre parcel already contains a septic <br />system, with adequate room for a secondary site. <br />With respect to access issues, staff noted the existing 11 -acre parcel contains a driveway <br />that is the sole source of access for the property to the west, at 815 Ash Street. The minor <br />subdivision approved in 1997, which created the parcels at 815 and 855 Ash Street, <br />required an easement agreement be drawn up for the driveway. This agreement was <br />approved by the City attorney and recorded with Anoka County. In addition, as a further <br />condition of approval, the driveway was approved by the Fire Chief. <br />Staff indicated the driveway is currently used primarily by the residents at 815 Ash <br />Street, as the Lindahls have their own access drive. Further subdivision of the 11 -acre <br />parcel would require shared use of this driveway, which may or may not pose a legal <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />