Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2002 <br />Page 10 <br />Mr. Lyden requested Mr. Lindahl obtain some written agreement with the neighbor <br />regarding use of the driveway. Mr. Lindahl replied all of that land would be owned by <br />Tract A, so it would be entirely owned by the new owner, and the new owner would be <br />informed to work out the driveway easement with the neighbor and this requirement <br />would be made at the time the land was transferred. He noted his neighbor was very <br />agreeable to working with this situation. <br />Ms. Gretz requested the following three conditions: <br />1. Park dedication fee to be paid <br />2. Standard drainage and utility easements <br />3. Right -of -Way as required by Anoka County. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. <br />Motion carried 3 -1 (Hyden). <br />D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Gary Uh C L 's Century Farm 6th —10th <br />Additions, South of Main St. & North of St. <br />Chair Schaps reopened the public heari <br />Staff stated the P & Z continued t ub`hc g " 's project at the August 14 <br />meeting. There were a number o es to <br />Staff noted major design issue <br />access and roads, parkland, potential new air park <br />lots, air park impa s <m�E� arl`s� development on surrounding lands. <br />Staff indicate <br />not allow t <br />. pplicant <br />staff to revie <br />ed ne plans on Wednesday, September 4. This did <br />analyze the new submittals. <br />Staff stated roa <br />connecting Carl St. <br />issue, and it affects num <br />ons are important design issues. The question of <br />extensively at the August meeting. This is a major <br />er aspects of the project and of this area of the City. <br />Staff is asking the P & Z to consider the following information and then give staff <br />direction on whether or not Carl St. should be connected. Based on that direction, staff <br />will work with the applicant on the design of the plat. <br />Staff stated the applicant hired a consultant to prepare a traffic study. The study was <br />summarized at the August meeting. At that time, staff had not had the opportunity to <br />review the traffic study. The City Engineer now has had the applicant's traffic study <br />analyzed. That analysis is attached (TKDA memo from Steven Elmer, August 23). Note <br />that several assumptions and conclusions in the study may not be universally accepted. <br />Staff noted the majority of P & Z members voiced opposition to connecting Carl St. to <br />the new development. At the same time, most P & Z members expressed support for new <br />air park lots that would each accommodate a home and a hanger. <br />