Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2002 <br />Page 8 <br />1111 parcel and 188 feet to the east of the one acre parcel. Thus, although the proposed lot has <br />330' of width on a road, it is not contiguous width. <br />Staff indicated Lino Lakes City Ordinance Section 3, subd. 3.B.1.b requires parcels <br />requiring a minimum of 10 acres or more to have a minimum of 20% upland area. Both <br />parcels meet this requirement: the 10 -acre parcel has four acres of upland, although this <br />upland exists as "islands" among wetland area, and the one acre parcel is almost entirely <br />composed of upland. <br />Staff stated soils tests confirm that the proposed 10 -acre parcel is capable of <br />accommodating a septic system. In addition, there is adequate room for both primary and <br />secondary sites. The one -acre parcel already contains a septic system, with adequate <br />room for a secondary site. <br />Staff indicated the existing 11 -acre parcel contains a second driveway, not used by the <br />Lindahls but existing on their property, that is the sole source of access for the <br />neighboring property to the west, at 815 Ash Street. Without this driveway, the property <br />at 815 would be landlocked, with no access out to Ash Street or any other road. The <br />minor subdivision approved in 1997, which created the parcels at 815 and 855 Ash Street, <br />required an easement agreement be drawn up for the driveway. This agreement was <br />approved by the City attorney and recorded with Anoka County. In addition, as a further <br />condition of approval, the driveway was approved by the Fire Chief. <br />Staff noted the driveway is currently used primarily by the residents at 815 Ash Street, as <br />the Lindahls have their own access drive. Further subdivision of the 11 -acre parcel <br />would require shared use of this driveway, which may or may not pose a legal issue: the <br />easement agreement states the easement is "for the exclusive benefit of Tracts B (855 <br />Ash Street) and C (815 Ash Street)." Further, the agreement states that "no party may <br />unreasonably increase the burden of the driveway and utility easement." The agreement <br />can be amended only with the written consent of both parties. <br />Staff stated the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that "in considering all requests for <br />variance or peal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: <br />1.) That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />Comment: The property has been, and currently is, being put to reasonable use. <br />The applicant is simply asking for a further intensification of use. <br />2.) That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br />his property, not created by the land owner. <br />Comment: The landowner is asking for a further subdivision of his land, which he <br />was advised "would probably not be recommended" when he first purchased his <br />property. <br />3.) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />