Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 8, 2003 <br />Page 26 <br />feel having Airpark lots provides better control than extending the lots and leaving the <br />trees. Also, the trees would be governed by the Airpark Association. In addition, there is <br />no guarantee that the homeowner will not cut them down anyway. <br />Chair Schaps asked how a house can be built on those lots. Mr. Uhde stated they will do <br />designated grading to minimize the negative impact to the trees. He assured the Board <br />they will save every tree possible. <br />Mr. Uhde stated they can add Lots 1, 2, and 3 to the Airpark but the Airpark By Laws <br />will have to be changed so they can accept them, which they have indicated they will do. <br />Chair Schaps asked about Outlot 5 which is identified as a large park area. Mr. Johnson <br />explained that Outlot B is in the first phase and Outlot C is in the second phase. He <br />stated there are eleven acres of upland in the dedicated park area. <br />Mr. Uhde showed the Board the disclosure documents and stated they provided this <br />information to every homeowner in Behm's and he has those signed disclosure forms on <br />file. He stated they have to sign that disclosure and it details that the Airpark is there. He <br />stated that sales associates were calling him constantly and knew about the Airpark. He <br />stated that if buyers were not told of that, they would probably have legal grounds against <br />their realtor. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked about the pond to the south and if it will be connected. Mr. Johnson <br />stated a pipe connects the southerly pond, across Palomino, and to the pond on the other <br />side. He stated that is designed to accommodate a 100 -year event. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he missed a few meetings and apologizes for that but has never been <br />comfortable with an extension of Carl Street because it was an existing cul -de -sac. He <br />stated he would be disappointed if that extension were to occur. <br />Mr. Uhde stated they did due diligence for the Airpark Association to make their case and <br />conducted a traffic study that showed Carl Street does not have to be connected. <br />However, City staff has indicated Carl Street does need to be extended and have letters <br />from the Police and Fire Departments. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he would also hope that something can be done with the sod farm <br />property. <br />Mr. Lyden stated Carl Street is not a street, this is a neighborhood and the City does not <br />have the right to destroy a current neighborhood to build a new one. He stated he may <br />have made a mistake at the last meeting when he asked for specific Fire and Police <br />Department letters but what is contained in the letters is not the kind of information he <br />was requesting. He requested staff provide response times through different areas of the <br />City, the average response time in the City, and the response time with Carl Street as it is <br />presently and if it was connected. He stated he would also like data on reasonable <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />