Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 8, 2003 <br />Page 33 <br />Page four shows the lots platted in 2002 (prior to the growth management policy being in <br />place) and the total for the projects, assuming additional projects will make up the 147 <br />each year. <br />Page five illustrates several things. It shows that we have an existing inventory at the end <br />of 2002 (about 208 lots) that is not governed by the new policy. It also shows that by <br />year end 2005, the existing inventory of lots will be used up and the annual target of 147 <br />new housing units will be achieved. That is, since the left over inventory is used up, only <br />the lots that are final platted according to the phasing plan schedule will be available. As <br />long as the City follows the policy, 147 new lots will come on line annually, and that is <br />all that can be built on. <br />Mr. Corson asked about the timing of approvals. Mr. Smyser stated staff will look at the <br />existing infrastructure, MUSA, etc. together with the premature development criteria. <br />Staff noted there is some flexibility built into the policy, as explained in paragraphs four <br />and five of the ordinance. <br />Staff advised that the moratorium on residential development expires in February. <br />Because of this, is important for the P & Z to make a recommendation to the City Council <br />at tonight's meeting. The ordinance is scheduled for a first reading by the City Council <br />on Monday, January 13. Staff recommended the adoption of the Growth Management <br />Ordinance. <br />Chair Schaps asked if anyone in the audience would like to make comment. <br />Eileen Couture, 6973 Lakeview Drive, stated she has lived in Lino Lakes for 20 years and <br />seen the rapid expansion. Because of that, she stated she thinks an annual review is an <br />important thing to assure things remain in check. She asked how individual lot splits <br />would be addressed. <br />Mr. Smyser stated it does not have to be just big projects and those individual lot splits <br />also have to be figured into the 147 number. He stated that, perhaps, a line should be <br />added into the matrix for individual lot splits or subdivisions without phasing plans since <br />they are new homes. Or, they could be exempted from the 147 since there are so few of <br />them. <br />Mr. Lyden noted the City Attorney will be looking at this policy closely because some <br />year it could get to the 21% over and a homeowner may make a request to split their lot. <br />He asked what basis would be used to tell them "no." Mr. Smyser stated the City decided <br />to limit growth and picked a number (147). He stated there will probably be instances <br />where a project would force the number over the limit but a fair policy would have to <br />apply to everyone. <br />Mr. Lyden stated he would assume that the City's legal counsel will do the research <br />necessary to assure the language can stand up in court if tested. Mr. Smyser stated he had <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />