My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/13/2003 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2003
>
08/13/2003 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2014 3:38:28 PM
Creation date
6/11/2014 12:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
08/13/2003
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'df iiidry 4, 2003 <br />There is no plan for ground story plantings in the existing plan. If there is <br />proposed sod for these areas, than these areas should be shown as <br />irrigated. The plan should show intentions of ground story and cover for all <br />landscaped areas including islands. All soils in these areas should be <br />thoroughly tilled with at least an additional 4" of topsoil added before tilling. <br />Norway maples and Amur maple should be substituted with a non-invasive <br />species. White oaks in this area would be more appropriate than Lindens. <br />Since there are a number of oaks proposed for removal from this site, oaks <br />should be paced back in. Additional oaks should be required around the <br />maintenance pond. There should be a tree inventory submitted that is in <br />data base form and readable. It is difficult to tell from the plan how many <br />oaks and what size oaks are proposed for removal. Several more oaks <br />should be planted in the "S", and East Side of the Retail Building area of the <br />landscape plan to screen housing to the East later. Oaks should be <br />substituted for Laurel leaf willow on the East Side of the Retail Building. The <br />Pre - settlement vegetation for this area is depicted on Exhibit 6. <br />The lighting plan should be tow- impact, "no- spill ", downward focused, <br />minimum lumen type of focus with any canopy enclosures unlit. The <br />existing lighting descriptions do not meet this requirement. This plan needs <br />revision. <br />Surface Water Management is very important on this site. Existing and <br />proposed water conveyance systems indicate a direct connection to Baldwin <br />Lake by h developer <br />���.. by the ditch. Since this is in a lake protection area, the developer <br />should show creativity in attenuating volume and quality issues. Post <br />development should try to lower volumes, maintain required rates, and <br />reducing nutrient loads. Pre and post - nutrient modeling should be <br />demonstrated. Surface water direction on impervious areas should be <br />directed to curb drops by the pond if this can be made to work. It appears <br />that before ditching, water flowed to Rice Lake and had a bit more buffer <br />before reaching the Lake. This might be an alternative. The Anoka County <br />Sand Plane Ground Water Modal depicts this area as very sensitive to <br />ground water pollution potential. (Exhibit 5). Any infiltration anticipated or <br />planned should have at least the 3 -foot minimum recommended separation <br />from the seasonally high water table. <br />If the proposed pond is large enough to contain all surface water storm <br />events for a 100-year flood, h Qn the environmental concerns become much <br />less. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.