My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/08/2003 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2003
>
10/08/2003 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2014 3:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/12/2014 10:22:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2003
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Lakeview Estates <br />page 3 <br />Preliminary Plat <br />Lots, Variances: As proposed, the lots will be 124+ feet in depth. The minimum lot depth <br />in an R -1 zone is 135 feet. The lot widths exceed the 80 ft. minimum requirement, and the lot <br />areas exceed the minimum of 10,800 sf. Because of the size of the existing property, it is <br />impossible to meet the 135' depth if new lots are to be created. <br />In considering a request for a variance, the following findings should be applicable: <br />a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property <br />not created by the land owner. <br />c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The existing home is on an individual septic system. The City has no record that the original <br />system installed in the 1950s has ever been replaced. Sewer and water are available in Elm St. <br />It is in the public interest to connect existing homes on old septic systems to city sewer whenever <br />feasible. The site is in the MUSA, it is in a Stage 1 growth area, public sewer service is available, <br />and the public sewer is a better option for public health and welfare. <br />The costs of the utilities are very high for a property the size of the existing lot. Additional lots <br />contribute to supporting the costs of the new utilities. It is unreasonable to mandate that the <br />homeowner spend the money to install a new drainfield when public utilities are available. <br />The property size is a physical circumstance that exists since the area was initially platted in <br />1949. The option of subdividing is available to other properties with road frontage. The site is <br />zoned R -1 and the purpose statement for the R -1 zone states that the zone is "intended for <br />development of single family detached homes on lots served with public sewer and water." <br />Streets and Driveways: No additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system <br />can accommodate the traffic generated by the two new homes. <br />Two driveway issues are worth noting. First, the existing driveway and garage for Lot 1 will be <br />removed. The new lot line will run through it. It is possible that a shared driveway would be a <br />workable option. If a shared driveway is not utilized, a new driveway must be built for Lot 1 <br />that meets the setback requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.