Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 12, 2003 <br />Page 18 <br />Chair Schaps stated he did not believe in "crimping" businesses as long as the banners <br />were in good shape and looked nice. He noted he did not see this is a big problem and he <br />was willing to look at some regulation, but this type of a regulation bothered him. <br />Mr. Hyden stated he did not have an issue with banners as long as they were temporary. <br />Unfortunately, the banners were not being used temporarily and that was the issue. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the issue was the number of signs a business had. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated it was difficult to come up with decisions, but he had to agree with <br />Mr. Tralle that the idea of a new, clean sign was better than an old sign, but he did not <br />like the idea of a permanent mounting structure. He liked the idea of trying to confine it <br />to the structure itself. He noted it might hamper some businesses, but the common factor <br />was that they were trying to make the City look nice and clean it up. He liked the idea of <br />a clean sign, but believed the administration part of it needed to be reduced. He stated he <br />did not want City staff to be on sign patrol to enforce signage issues when the resources <br />could be better used. However, he also did not want to make this difficult for the <br />businesses owners either. <br />Mr. Smyser stated there was a concern that things were starting to look "trashy ". <br />Mr. Hyden stated it surprised him that only one business owner showed up when many <br />businesses had been notified of this discussion. <br />Mr. Wagner stated he had an issue with the two -week time limit for the banners. He did <br />not have an issue with the banner size. He noted a business owner wanted to change their <br />signs every month to encourage new customers to come in. <br />Mr. Smyser stated it was Council's intent to get P &Z input, but there was no direction <br />from the Council that they wanted a recommendation from the Board. <br />Chair Schaps requested this discussion get continued to the January meeting. <br />B. Fabric Accessory Structures <br />Staff stated a number of residents were constructing temporary fabric structures, <br />primarily for the storage of vehicles. He indicated staff was seeking direction from the P <br />& Z as to adding language to the zoning ordinance to address this type of structure. He <br />noted staff would then take those recommendations and prepare an Ordinance for a future <br />public meeting. But, with the number of projects on the upcoming agendas it may be best <br />to drop this one until sometime in the future. <br />Chair Schaps requested this discussion be postponed indefinitely. <br />VII. ADJOURNMENT <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 11:14 p.m., and was supported by <br />Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />