My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
04/14/2004 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:53:59 AM
Creation date
6/13/2014 2:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2004
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />2. To help guide development of urban and rural areas along an orderly design to preserve <br />continuity and efficiency of service. <br />3. To provide a method by which the urban farm can be guided so as to control urban <br />sprawl and still conserve land in an economic status until such time as the need is present <br />for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. <br />4. To reduce the possibilities of rural -urban conflicts in establishing types and levels of <br />service, methods of financing the services and needs. To maintain an acceptable per <br />capita cost for such services as sanitary sewer, water, police, fire, road maintenance, <br />school transportation, and other necessary services. <br />The comprehensive plan establishes a growth strategy which includes prohibiting new lots less <br />than 10 acres in staged growth areas. Departing from this would interfere with the orderly <br />design intended to preserve continuity and efficiency of service. Future development will be <br />reviewed based on complete information for the proposed development. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Approve the requested variances for lot area and lot width. <br />2. Deny the variances. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Option 2 <br />• The proposed variances would provide for a minor subdivision that is inconsistent with the <br />comprehensive plan strategy. <br />• A new lot would exceed the allowable growth under the growth management policy. <br />• The variance request is based on economic considerations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.