07/14/2004 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 2 medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Staff stated applicant had submitted a request for a conditional use permit for a residential planned unit development (PUD), and development stage plan (preliminary plat). The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. A PUD is required for multi- family development in a shoreland area. The applicant withdrew a previous application, so this is considered a new application. No rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment is needed or requested. The site was rezoned to R -3 earlier this year, making it consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). 2. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final plat. 3. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application: - change black ash to green ash or a native oak species - change Austrian pine to red or white spruce - change Colorado spruce to white spruce - change autumn applause to northern pin oak -three spruce at the Aqua Lane corner shall be moved east at least 20 feet 4. Exterior building materials must be submitted three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application. 5. The project must obtain approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to City Council consideration of the application. 6. The City Engineer's comments in the June 4, 2004 memo must be met to his satisfaction. 7. Park dedication be paid. 8. All existing buildings be removed. 9. Septic systems removed and wells capped. 10. Guest parking be installed. Mr. Pogalz asked if both the buildings located on the property would be removed. Mr. Smsyer replied all structures on site would be removed. Mr. Pogalz asked if wells and septic systems would also be removed. Mr. Smyser replied they would be required to be removed and he would add this as a condition of approval. Mr. Pogalz stated there was no guest parking shown and with the narrow road, he believed guest parking should be required. He recommended expanding the roads to 28 feet, or at a minimum guest parking being added. DRAFT MINUTES • • •