Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 9, 2004 <br />Page 7 <br />1. Issuance of the sequencing permit by the RCWD, based on Application No. <br />03 -090. <br />2. That relocating the wetland will not adversely affect neighboring properties. <br />3. That location of proposed driveways be shown. <br />4. That appropriate park fees are provided. <br />5. That the City Engineer's recommendations be included in these <br />recommendations. <br />Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. <br />Chair Schaps questioned if the Rice Creek Watershed would be approving this and asked <br />if they were approving this too soon. He noted this was a big leap to assume this was <br />going to be approved. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if this would not be presented until 2005. Mr. Smyser replied that <br />was correct. <br />Mr. Root stated there were a lot of conditions and he believed it put a lot of burdens on <br />the staff to make sure the contingencies were complied with and he believed this was <br />something they should be dealing with. <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if the original request was denied as presented. Mr. Thompson replied <br />that was correct. <br />Mr. Pogalz stated it was his understanding applicant was now proceeding with the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District's suggestions. Mr. Thompson replied he believed that was <br />accurate. <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if this was a good time for the applicant to get a stub now to the <br />utilities. Mr. Thompson replied with the road repair taking place now, this was an <br />appropriate time to obtain a stub. <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he did not want to miss the applicant's to have the opportunity to put in <br />a stub at this time and end up tearing up a newly constructed road in the next couple of <br />year. <br />Tim Macki, applicant's engineer and surveyor, stated they never got denied from the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District initially. He stated they were in discussion with Carl <br />Hammers, which pushed their plans back, and this was tabled by the District pending <br />receipt by the various information they required. <br />Chair Schaps asked where would they be a month from now with respect to Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. Mr. Macki replied he anticipated they would have their permit. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />