Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 14, 2004 <br />Page 6 <br />Chair Rafferty asked Mr. Hokanson to come forward. He asked him if they could make <br />alternate 3 work with the additional parking. Mr. Hokanson replied alternate 3 was not a <br />good alternate. He stated when he was at the meeting last time, he had not received good <br />direction from the Board. He stated if the Board wanted to change the development, <br />alternate 1 was the best option. He stated with alternate 1, they could get additional <br />parking. He noted it was his misunderstanding that they wanted parking shown in <br />alternates 1, 2, and 3. <br />Mr. Tralle stated a lot of time was put on a four -color scheme and he appreciated that <br />they had brought in a four -color scheme proposal tonight. He noted, however, he was not <br />happy that they had not addressed the guest parking on the alternatives. He asked if they <br />could table this to the next meeting. <br />Mr. Hokanson stated he wanted a decision tonight because of the timing. Mr. Smyser <br />replied the Board still had time if they wanted to continue this to the next meeting. <br />Chair Rafferty stated if the Board chose an alternate, it might not be the alternate they <br />want. He noted they could move forward to Council with a negative or positive from the <br />P &Z Board. He requested they look at alternate 3 and add parking so they could actually <br />see the plan and asked if they be willing to agree to continuing this to the next meeting. <br />Mr. Hokanson replied they were not opposed to alternate 3 and they would add parking to <br />that plan and agree to a tabling. <br />The Board discussed various options as to how alternate 3 could be reworked that would <br />address the Board's concerns. <br />Mr. Pogalz noted he did not care how much parking there was, as long as it was <br />sufficient. He indicated they had not said the development needed 18 spaces and if less <br />spaces fit well, they needed to look at that. With respect to the color scheme he wanted <br />the colors to fit with the rest of the area. <br />Mr. Tralle stated he would be in agreement if each road had a different color scheme, but <br />he was opposed to the entire development having one color scheme. Mr. Hyden agreed. <br />Mr. Hokanson asked for a little more leeway with the color scheme. Chair Rafferty <br />stated he would look at the color schemes provided to staff and would work with Mr. <br />Hokanson on this issue. <br />Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to table this to the August, 2004 P &Z Board meeting and <br />was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he or any other Board member would be willing to meet or talk with <br />Mr. Hokanson prior to the next meeting if he had any questions about what the Board <br />was directing. <br />D. Variance to Side Yard Setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Bacchus Homes <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />