Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 8, 2004 <br />Page 5 <br />Resident, Deerwood Lane, expressed concern about the increase of traffic during the day <br />in his neighborhood. He stated adding an additional 50 -60 homes would add additional <br />traffic and he requested the traffic study address the traffic during off peak hours. Mr. <br />Studenski explained how the traffic study was prepared. He noted while the traffic study <br />made generalizations, there were design standard projections that were followed through <br />on a traffic study. <br />Heather Parony (sp ?), 745 Fox Road, expressed concern regarding traffic and the safety <br />of children in the area. She encouraged the Board to have a second access in this <br />development. She stated she was a new resident in the neighborhood and chose this <br />neighborhood because she did not want to live on a busy street. <br />Bill Ojile, asked the City to get actual trip counts today and determine what this <br />development would add to the traffic. <br />Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. <br />Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, stated he could understand the anxiety of the residents in <br />the area. He stated they had been working with the Board and City staff for some months <br />on this development. He stated they were not able to submit a plan at this meeting was <br />because Rice Creek Watershed District was still working on a MnRAM study. He <br />indicated this type of study took a lot of time. He stated he hoped they would have a plan <br />at the October meeting. He noted the application to the City was for a preliminary plat <br />and did not ask for any variances. He indicated they were aware of the traffic concern. <br />He stated he could have the traffic engineer at the next meeting to answer any questions. <br />He stated the study showed the increase of traffic would not have a significant impact to <br />the existing neighborhoods. He noted they would be working closely with the City <br />Engineer on the drainage concerns. He stated they would provide stormwater quality and <br />rate control. He noted impacts to the wetlands would lead to mitigation and there would <br />be areas that were upland today that would need to be used as mitigation areas for this <br />development. He indicated they would do their best to address the concerns brought up <br />at tonight's meeting. <br />Mr. Hyden asked if there had been any neighborhood meetings. Mr. Black stated early <br />on they had a neighborhood meeting. He believed the meeting was held in March, 2003. <br />Mr. Laden asked what kind of market would these homes be marketed to and the price <br />range of the homes. Mr. Black replied they were looking for single - family lots <br />comparable to Pheasant Hills. He stated by the time the lots were valued, he believed the <br />homes would be at $500,000.00. <br />Mr. Root stated that he wanted to see traffic and drainage issues addressed thoroughly at <br />the next meeting. He asked for specific, technical details and recommended the traffic <br />engineer be present at that meeting. <br />Chair Rafferty stated while traffic was a concern, the developer had the right to develop <br />the property. He noted the hearing would be continued until next month. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />