12/08/2004 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• Amendment to the Growth Management Ordinance • • Motion to approve the changes to the Growth Management Ordinance by Smith, second by O'Dea. All were in favor. Motion passed. Mike Vaughan Subdivision The Environmental Board recommended the approval of the Mike Vaughan Subdivision proposal with the following comments and recommendations: • Save as many trees as possible • Mitigate any oak wilt started on the site • The rain gardens should use the City Native Seed Mix, and the developer should hire a nurseryman experienced in native plant establishment to plant and manage this area for at least 3 years. • Under the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Notes of the proposal, Item 2 should say that 4 inches of topsoil will be thoroughly tilled into the soil • The notes should include a statement that "no soil shall be imported or exported from the site with out City approval • Under the Stomiwater Prevention Plan Notes of the proposed plan, their should include a statement that the City will be notified when storm water must be treated with alternative BMPs and agree to them • Under the notes section of the proposed plan, the note on external washing of construction vehicles should include the washing of internal components of cement trucks and be limited to a defined area • An additional stockpiling of rock should be on hand, on the site to top dress rock entrances should existing rock entrances become filled up • The ponds should be dug with minimum compaction equipment and fenced off to further traffic during construction. • The notes should indicate that the site soils will be restored to pre - construction densities and that this would be accomplished by tilling, plowing, disking, or ripping. • The Developer should provide adequate landscape screening to adjacent residences. This screening if in rain garden and treatment pond areas should be appropriate for these areas. The screening and recommended 1 boulevard tree per house frontage should be approved by the City. • Have Staff look at the feasibility of an alternative to a cul -de -sac design • Page 2