Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 10, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br />Staff recommended approval of the project including a variance to the minimum road <br />frontage requirements, a variance to the minimum lot size requirements, and a minor <br />subdivision, subject to the condition that when ownership of these properties changes <br />hands, the new owner(s) is required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid <br />creating a new parcel. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if it is the intent of St. Paul Regional Water Services to sell the 10 acre <br />parcel for future construction of homes and requested clarification regarding Parcel 21. <br />Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. <br />Bill Tschida, St. Paul Regional Water Services, stated Parcel 21 is currently being <br />operated within the park system and a Purchase Agreement has been executed whereby <br />the County will now purchase this parcel. He stated both splits are being driven by what <br />the County wants to buy and operate as a park. <br />Mr. Tschida added that Parcel B of Parcel 3 is directly in front of private property and <br />represents a similar strip of land surrounding Centerville Lake and would be made <br />available for purchase to the adjacent private property owners. He stated he has had some <br />conversations with Mr. Smyser about how to do future lot splits all around the lake and <br />indicated they would prefer to obtain blanket approval. <br />Staff indicated if it is the intention to further divide the property in the future and to sell it <br />to individual property owners, it could be addressed in the Board's action so the <br />individual property owners do not have to come back for a variance. <br />Mr. Tschida stated he intended the blanket approval would be in anticipation of property <br />owners wanting to subdivide in the future. <br />Chair Rafferty stated that because Mr. Smyser is not in attendance this evening, the <br />Planning & Zoning Board should approve the variance based on staffs recommendation. <br />Staff noted the minor subdivision would be accomplished administratively. <br />Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend Option 1 to approve the project, including a <br />variance to the minimum road frontage requirements, a variance to the minimum lot size <br />requirements, and a variance for minimum lot width to allow the division of the subject <br />sites by an administrative minor subdivision, subject to the condition that when <br />ownership of these properties change hands, the new owner(s) are required to combine <br />them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel, and was supported by Mr. <br />Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. <br />B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for a 5 -lot Residential <br />Development named Vaughan Addition, Michael Vaughan, 600 Birch Street <br />Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />