My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 1:29:42 PM
Creation date
6/18/2014 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 12, 2005 <br />Page 8 <br />Lloyd Chalupsky, 2215 Reiling Road, asked if the overhang was a part of the five foot <br />setback. Mr. Bengston replied the overhang was allowed into the five foot setback. <br />Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend denial of the variance to allow a 1.2 foot <br />side yard setback for a detached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is required <br />requested by Kenneth Muehlstedt, 2221 Reiling Road based on staff s recommendations <br />as outlined in staff's January 12, 2005 report and adding a fifth recommendation that the <br />concrete slab that falls within the five foot setback be investigated by staff and removed <br />if necessary and was supported by Mr. Haden. <br />Mr. Laden added an amendment number six that an as -built survey be completed by the <br />applicant. Mr. Haden asked if that had not been addressed in condition number 2. <br />Mr. Bengtson replied a survey would be required, but not an as -built survey. He stated it <br />was staff's intent to not have applicant prepare two surveys. However, if the Board <br />wants an as -built survey, this could be added. <br />Mr. Laden replied he wanted an as -built survey prepared by applicant. <br />Mr. Pogalz accepted Mr. Laden's amendment. Mr. Hayden concurred. <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Temporary Signage Update <br />Mr. Smyser noted the Board had been discussing the temporary signage issue for some <br />time. The goal was to prepare amendments to the existing sign ordinance. At the <br />November meeting, the P &Z agreed on specific requirements for portable signs and <br />banners. These would be incorporated into an ordinance amendment. <br />Mr. Laden asked if they needed to add something that the City had the right to remove a <br />sign that did not have a permit. Mr. Smyser replied the owner of the sign would be cited <br />and required to take it down, or else they would be taken to Court. <br />Mr. Bengtson stated the requirement to have banners be professionally lettered should <br />also be added as a condition. <br />Mr. Laden asked what would be considered professional lettering. Mr. Bengtson stated <br />they could require that there be no handwritten signs. <br />Mr. Smyser stated they could look into this more. Mr. Laden stated a design artist could <br />make a sign look hand lettered as a design element. <br />Mr. Laden stated he felt as long as they paid a permit fee and it was a limited time, the <br />applicant could do the sign however they wanted. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.