Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM VI. B <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 <br />TOPIC: Temporary Signage <br />BACKGROUND <br />A number of business owners attended the March 9 meeting and expressed some <br />concerns regarding the regulation of signage. The P & Z asked that the business owners <br />get together and present their preferences for the regulation of temporary signs. <br />We received two sets of proposals. Both are attached. <br />The P & Z had reached agreement on requirements for banners and portable signs (see <br />attached). The two proposals received from separate business owners differ from these <br />requirements. The P & Z will need to decide if it wants to reconsider the requirements <br />for banners and portable signs. <br />The P & Z agreed to recommend no regulation of window signs. There are other forms <br />of temporary signage to address. These include pennants and the miscellaneous <br />inexpensive cardboard and plastic signs often seen at retail businesses in the city. <br />Signs in County Rights of Way: Staff contacted the Anoka County Highway Dept. to <br />discuss the possibility of metal signs advertising several businesses, like the ones seen on <br />freeways. Anoka County does not have such a sign program. The topic has come up and <br />the County specifically decided not to pursue such a program. Even if the City were to <br />request this type of signs, it is the County's policy not to allow them in County rights of <br />way. The County does allow signs for public uses such as parks and public buildings, but <br />not for advertising for private businesses. <br />The only exception has been when access to a business is cut off by a County road <br />project. Then, a sign might be put upgiving direction to the new access such as a <br />frontage road. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Review the signage proposals submitted by business owners. <br />