My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/13/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
04/13/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 3:06:25 PM
Creation date
6/19/2014 9:38:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/13/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Apollo Landing, page 4 <br />reen Area <br />The GB (General Business) zoning district requires that impervious surface coverage not exceed 75 %. The <br />submitted plans currently show the property at approximately 70.5% impervious surface coverage, well within <br />the limitations of the zoning district. Revisions to the plans depicting additional landscape islands in the <br />parking area shared by lots 2, 3, and 4 further reduces that percentage. <br />Parking <br />The parking analysis is attached to the end of this report. It clearly shows that the site is providing parking at or <br />above the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The lack of defined tenants for the retail /commercial /office <br />portions of the site makes the reduction of parking a difficult task to undertake. City staff certainly does not <br />want to eliminate parking which then causes the tenant mix allowed on the site to be limited. With the parking <br />provided a variety of uses (as allowed within the zoning district) can be provided for with the parking depicted <br />on the site plan. Originally the applicant was proposing to use some parking spaces be eliminated in favor of <br />trash enclosures, though staff is recommending that trash storage be seamlessly integrated into the designs of <br />the building. Recommendations from the Environmental Board as well as city staff regarding increased <br />landscaping in the parking area shared by lots 2, 3, and 4 have been implemented without reducing the parking <br />provided on site. <br />Access /Circulation <br />, ccess to the site is via an entry /exit driveway directly from Apollo Drive. As indicated in the City Engineer's <br />emorandum, approval for this access must be obtained from Anoka County. The applicant has submitted a <br />separate application to Anoka County; however comments have not been made available at the time of this <br />report. <br />Lighting <br />The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application includes the lighting for the entry drive and the <br />hotel property, and meets city standards. Staff is recommending a condition requiring all future development to <br />include a photometric lighting plan of the entire site that depicts all development so a comprehensive review <br />can be completed with each building. <br />Exhibits for the lighting fixtures are included in the architectural design standards for the project. <br />Signage <br />As the applicant is proposing multi- tenant buildings, and the architectural design standards for the site are <br />designed to create a cohesive design throughout the entire commercial center. The architectural design <br />standards also include the sign plan for the development. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.