Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 13, 2005 <br />Page 26 <br />indicated he was losing business by not facing the road. He noted he was not a fan of <br />banners, but they were necessary for businesses. He stated if developers could have <br />numerous signs, so why couldn't he have one temporary sign, which was taken down at <br />the end of the day that advertised his specials. <br />Chair Rafferty asked Mr. Szyplinski where his advertising dollars went. Mr. Szyplinski <br />replied he advertised on TV and the newspapers, as well as paying an advertising fee <br />through his franchise. <br />Chair Rafferty stated businesses could advertise in moderation at the right time. Mr. <br />Szyplinski asked if they could put a permanent sign on private property if they have the <br />private property owner's permission. He asked how could they get help from the City. <br />Chair Rafferty asked the businesses look into what a sign like Community National Bank <br />had cost. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if City Council directed the P &Z Board to look at this, or should the <br />business owners go directly to the Council to express their concerns. <br />Mr. Hyden noted they kept getting off of topic and all signage would eventually come <br />before them. He asked if they should move on with banners or address permanent signs. <br />He noted they were only a recommending body anyway and had no approval power. <br />Chair Rafferty asked if this would go to Council as an entire package once everything <br />had been decided. Mr. Smyser responded it would and this all started because a couple of <br />times a year the building official picked up temporary signage and wrote letters. He <br />indicated a group of people received the letters and contacted the City upset about <br />receiving the letters and their signs being taken down. Staff directed them to the Council <br />and Council directed P &Z come up with a recommendation. <br />Mr. Wagner stated if they did not allow banners and did not get to permanent signage for <br />two or three years, he would be unable to advertise for two or three years. Mr. Smyser <br />suggested they take this information and look at banners next month. <br />Mr. Nelson stated if they made a decision on banners tonight, would it go into effect <br />tonight. Mr. Hyden replied this did not take effect until the entire package went to the <br />City Council. <br />Chair Rafferty asked if they were ready to make a recommendation on banners. <br />Mr. Nelson stated he was not. <br />Mr. Pogalz stated he could go either way. <br />Mr. Laden stated they had already reached as a group a banner decision and they needed <br />to move on. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />