My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/08/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
06/08/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 2:37:23 PM
Creation date
6/19/2014 11:02:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/08/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />I -35E Corridor Draft AUAR June 2, 2005 <br />Table 21 -5 displays the overall Level of Service (LOS) for all of the analyzed intersections for the <br />development scenarios for 2030 build -out and post 2030 build -out conditions. Table 21 -6 displays the LOS <br />for each of the turning movements for the 2030 build -out conditions. The intersection traffic volumes for <br />the full development of the scenarios (post 2030) resulted in severe congestion for virtually all turning <br />movements and therefore are not shown in the table. <br />The proposed developments will increase traffic on roadways within, and adjacent to the AUAR area. <br />Mitigation will include adding traffic signals and turn lanes and widening roads as necessary during the <br />various stages of development (see Figures 25 -8 through Figure 25 -12). In general, Scenario One had the <br />least impact on traffic congestion with two intersections performing at LOS F, without mitigation. Scenario <br />Two had four intersections and Scenario Three had six intersections operating at LOS F, respectively. With <br />reasonable mitigation measures all the intersections in Scenarios One and Two were able to operate at LOS <br />E or worse. Even with reasonable mitigation measures, Scenario Three, which has a residential emphasis, <br />still had intersections performing at LOS F. These include the east ramps at the proposed Northerly <br />Bypass/I -35W interchange, and the intersection of CSAH 14 and Otter Lake Road. <br />To mitigate the impact of the additional traffic on the regional system I -35W and I -35E would need to be <br />reconstructed to provide a six -lane cross - section. It should be noted that it was determined that an <br />expansion will be necessary even without the development scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates <br />serve a much larger area, the projected growth of the entire Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by <br />the year 2030. <br />Figures 21 -8, 21 -9, and 21 -10 display the intersection LOS for each of the scenarios and also display the <br />mitigation measures that were identified to address the deficiencies. <br />Ecologically Sensitive Resources <br />The AUAR area contains a wealth of ecologically sensitive resources including high quality natural and <br />semi - natural areas, wildlife corridors, two rare animals, the Peltier Lake Island Heron Rookery, two rare <br />plant communities, and portions of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. Mitigating impacts to <br />ecologically sensitive resources is discussed throughout the Draft AUAR. <br />The Conservation Design Framework (Figure 10 -3 and described under Item 10) is designed to conserve <br />wildlife habitat and natural plant communities, and will provide an invaluable tool for conservation of <br />wildlife and rare features within the AUAR area. Most importantly, the Conservation Design Framework <br />protects the existing significant fish, wildlife, and ecological sensitive resources in the northwest portion of <br />the AUAR, and goes beyond to identify and protect the most significant outlier habitats, buffering them, <br />and connecting them with greenway corridors. In brief, conservation design principles behind the <br />Framework include: <br />• protect streams, lakes, and groundwater by purifying, filtering, and infiltrating surface runoff to the <br />maximum extent possible <br />• preserve, restore, and enhance existing natural and semi - natural areas and wildlife habitat <br />• create wildlife opportunities by restoring and managing wildlife habitat <br />• establish wide buffers and connections around and between core and outlier habitats <br />The greenway corridors are designed to connect the larger and higher quality natural areas. These corridors <br />will provide three main services: 1) stormwater collection and conveyance, 2) ecological corridors for <br />wildlife movement and native plant dispersal, and 3) recreational trails for people. Certain greenway <br />corridors may warrant design for specific wildlife species, may provide certain stormwater management <br />opportunities, or may need to accommodate different types of trails or passive recreational uses. Design <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.