My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/13/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
07/13/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 2:24:41 PM
Creation date
6/19/2014 11:27:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/13/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4i <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />Sign Ordinance Amendments <br />page 2 <br />Formatting: A major change is the formatting of the ordinance. The current ordinance <br />is organized by zoning district, with regulations listed under each district, and other <br />requirements in a "general" section. This results in a very lengthy ordinance. It is <br />difficult to find relevant regulations. <br />In the new draft, temporary signage is addressed in a completely new table instead of <br />individual requirements scattered in different places. In addition, we have moved the <br />regulations for permanent signs into a table to make it easier to locate the requirements in <br />each district. <br />Prohibited If Not Included: One very important amendment is that any signs not <br />specifically allowed by the ordinance are prohibited. That is, only if the ordinance does <br />not specifically allow a typed of sign, that type of sign is prohibited. This is how the <br />draft addresses the "miscellaneous" temporary signs that are so difficult to define. They <br />are not banners, portable signs, balloons, construction signs, or real estate signs. They <br />are not permanent signs. Therefore, they are prohibited. <br />Existing Sign Plans for Multi - Occupancy Buildings: Several developments consist <br />of a single structures with multiple tenants. The ordinance requires a signage plan for <br />such buildings. The developer is required to submit a signage plan as part of the <br />development application review. Staff works with the developer on a sign plan, which <br />ultimately is adopted by the City. This becomes the sign regulation document for that <br />development. <br />Several individual development signage plans have been adopted under this procedure. <br />Such signage plans would not be amended automatically by amending the sign ordinance. <br />Each signage plan would have to be revisited, at the request of the development owner, if <br />the plan is to be amended. Tenants should discuss this with the property owner. <br />Fees: The city's fee schedule includes sign permit fees. Temporary signs permits are <br />$25. Permanent sign fees are determined by the building code. An excerpt from the fee <br />schedule is attached. <br />There are other issues in the existing sign ordinance that perhaps merit attention. <br />However, the intent of the current amendments is to establish and clarify requirements for <br />temporary signage and related issues. The draft also clarifies or amends some confusing <br />requirements. Amending the overall ordinance is a much larger task. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Approve sign ordinance amendments and forward to City Council. <br />2. Continue public hearing and provide direction on revising draft ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.