Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Paul Bengston September 8, 2005 <br />Comment: Also address the reduction of the number of proposed lots from 78 to 72 as is shown <br />on the revised site plan. <br />Response: A reduction in the number of units from 78 to 72 will result in approximately 5% <br />fewer trips being generated by the site, as a whole. <br />The number of trips choosing to use Lois Lane, while expected to be zero, is dependent on how <br />close to the east end of the development the particular lot that generates the trip is located. <br />Reducing the total number of lots from 78 to 72 should not change the number of lots near the <br />east end of the development and therefore will likely not affect the number of trips made to the <br />south. <br />Comment: The memo should have a traffic generation map attached to it. <br />Response: Please refer to the original Traffic Impact Study (dated July 21, 2005) for the Trip <br />Distribution figure. <br />Comment: 1 think the impact to Lois Lane will . • hg er th. t 7% stated during the peak <br />hour. 1 think some drivers will use Lois Lane a s . ay i o ` .e commercial area to the <br />south. <br />Response: Drivers will likely choose <br />this consideration it is unlikely that <br />the south, as stated in the August 24 <br />Further, if, using a differe <br />indeed choose to use Lois La <br />the Lois Lane neighborhood will <br />in net zero impact. <br />shortest travel time. Based on <br />ane to access commercial areas to <br />tvers from the proposed development do <br />the south, it is just as likely that drivers from <br />d Street A to access areas to the north, resulting <br />Comment: I agree that the two roads need to be connected for emergency vehicles, school busses <br />ect. Two long dead ends are not in the best interest of the residents or the City. <br />Response: Agreed. <br />RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 2 of 2 <br />G: \23 LLC \2005- 447- M\traftic \report\Response to Additional Comments 09- 08- 05.doc <br />RECEIVED <br />SEP 0 8 2005 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />Pine Glen Mixed -Use <br />2005 -447 -M <br />