My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/08/2006 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
03/08/2006 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 12:32:15 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 2:22:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/08/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 14, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the CUP Amendment for Molin <br />Concrete subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. <br />Pogalz. Motion to recommend approval of the CUP Amendment for Molin Concrete <br />carried 6 -0. <br />E. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development <br />for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria <br />Chair Rafferty reopened the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. <br />Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report, which included a draft of the Signage Criteria for <br />Legacy at Woods Edge. <br />Staff recommended approval. <br />Mr. Laden asked if there was a difference between residential and commercial signage <br />requirements. Mr. Bengtson stated that language could be added to make the distinction <br />more clear. Mr. Laden responded that he was not requesting a language change, but was <br />confirming there was a difference. <br />Mr. Hyden asked if freestanding signs are limited to the YMCA and City Hall. Mr. <br />Bengtson replied that was correct, and the reason was because these structures are set <br />back from the Right -of -Way. Staff does not want to encourage monument signs that <br />might interfere with visibility or accessibility of a site. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if there would be additional signage requirements in the future. Mr. <br />Bengtson replied that this would be the entire signage ordinance for this development. <br />Mr. Laden asked if there is a permit process to allow for temporary signs. Mr. Bengtson <br />replied that Section 5.3 describes which signs require permits. Mr. Bengtson noted that <br />banners and hand - written signs will be prohibited throughout the development. <br />Mr. Rafferty appreciated staffs efforts to regulate the size of signs. Mr. Rafferty <br />wondered why there was no requirement as to the centering of a building sign. Mr. <br />Bengtson explained that there is a margin requirement on either edge of a building wall <br />face, in order to prevent a sign to be placed all the way to a corner or edge of a building. <br />Mr. Rafferty questioned if the proposed six -inch margin would be enough. Mr. Bengtson <br />responded that the margin requirements could be increased for single tenant buildings. <br />There were no further questions for staff. <br />Mr. Hyden made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 7:22 p.m. Motion was <br />supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend approval to Amend the Planned Unit <br />Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria. Motion was <br />supported by Mr. Pogalz. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.