Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Pheasant Stroll Estates <br />page 3 <br />The submitted plan includes a private drive access onto CR J. The applicants propose a <br />temporary private access to CR J which then would be removed in the future when the <br />new public street is built. The private drive would connect to the new public street near <br />the northwest corner of the site. <br />Two problems arise with the proposal. First, it would be difficult to get the "temporary" <br />access removed and connect with the new public street. Residents of the townhome <br />neighborhood likely would oppose removing an existing driveway access and substituting <br />a connection to a public street. Once an access exists, and the entire neighborhood is <br />built and populated while that access exists, it is very difficult to remove it. In addition, <br />we have experienced many occasions where residents oppose a new connection to an <br />abutting development after they are accustomed to isolation. <br />The second problem is that the proposed design puts all of a new street entirely on <br />another property. This would mean that the property owner to the west would bear the <br />entire loss of land to the road. It is typical to align roads on property lines, with half the <br />right of way dedicated from development on each side. <br />It is possible that the site could access directly onto Ware Road. However, this does not <br />resolve the need for a future public road on the west side and right of way for that road. <br />• In short, the proposed design does not take into account the larger public interests in <br />access management. Staff does not support the proposed design. <br />• <br />The proposal does include additional 50 feet of right of way dedication for CR J. <br />However, more right of way is needed: 60 feet from centerline, which is what the Anoka <br />County Highway Dept. would plan for. This would push all the units north ten feet. In <br />addition, the setback from an arterial road is 40 feet, not the proposed 30 feet. Therefore, <br />with the right of way and complete setback, the units would need to move north 20 feet. <br />This has a significant affect on the site layout: it pushes the internal road into Lot 1, and <br />eliminates several units elsewhere in the plan. <br />The proposed plat does include land for the future realignment of Ware Rd. The goal <br />there is for the City to be able to align Ware Rd. with the existing Mackubin St. in <br />Shoreview in the future to create a four -way intersection rather than the existing off set <br />situation. However, a setback of 40 is needed from Ware rather than 30 feet, which <br />would affect the layout by moving units west by 10 feet. <br />Staff discussed the shortcomings of the proposed site design with the applicant. The <br />applicants chose not to provide for a public street for access to Co. Rd. J. <br />Utilities: Municipal utilities comprise the other vital infrastructure element in the <br />49/J planning study. The proposed design of Pheasant Stroll Estates includes a utility <br />corridor connecting to the water and sanitary sewer trunks existing in Ware Road. The <br />infrastructure plan must be completed to determine how the larger area can be served. <br />