Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />AGENDA ITEM V B <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />P & Z MEETING DATE: July 13, 2011 <br />DISCUSSION TOPIC: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING <br />Amending Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance <br />(Residential Zones) <br />BACKGROUND <br />This P & Z opened this public hearing at the June meeting. We went through Section 6 in its <br />entirety and resolved most issues. The Board continued the hearing to allow further discussion <br />of two topic areas: minimum dwelling unit sizes, and; a proposed maximum garage door <br />proportion in the R -2 zone. The Board directed staff to look at some home sizes and designs in <br />the building market and research ordinance requirements of other communities for comparisons. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Minimum Dwelling Unit Sizes. The first question relates to the minimum size requirements <br />for residential dwelling units, both detached houses and multifamily units. The current <br />ordinance lists minimum square footages for floor areas. The Board supported changing this to <br />footprint areas for detached homes. However, questions arose over what is an appropriate <br />minimum, given that the housing market is moving toward smaller homes. A related question <br />arose whether the City should establish minimum dwelling unit sizes at all versus just leaving it <br />to market forces to address consumer demands. <br />To facilitate discussion, I suggest addressing the this multi- faceted issue in the following order: <br />• Question: Should the ordinance establish minimum dwelling unit sizes? <br />Option A) If the answer is no, the problem is solved. <br />Option B) If the answer is yes, we need to determine the following: <br />1. the minimum footprint for <br />a) single family detached dwellings <br />and <br />b) twin homes <br />and <br />c) how to account for an attached garage in the footprint minimum <br />and <br />2. the minimum livable floor area for attached dwelling units <br />