11/13/2013 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Ms. Katie Larsen November 6, 2013 Page 2 Proposed Phasing Plan Comments: 1. It should be noted that all of the utilities and streets located in Phase 6 and Phase 7 will be constructed with Phase 6. Amended Grading Plan Comments: 1. The plan is not legible and needs to be re -done so that it is at least a 1 " =50' scale. 2. It does not appear that the proposed contour tie into the existing contour north and south of the proposed improvements. The grading plan needs to clearly demonstrate how the proposed grading will tie into the surrounding property. 3. The grading shown for all of the lots includes the rear portions of the lot discharging directly onto the adjacent property. The site cannot increase the rate of discharge onto the adjacent property. 4. A Rice Creek Watershed District permit will be required as part of this project. The applicant should consult with RCWD to determine if their current or proposed rules will have any impact on the site design since the rules have changed since this project was previously approved. 5. Soil borings and any information pertaining to the existing ground water elevations needs to be submitted. 6. The location of the existing well and septic system on the Morel] property needs to be shown on the plans. 7. Emergency overflow elevations for the street low points need to be shown on the plans. 8. A typical street section needs to be shown on the plans. 9. The location of the rock construction entrance must be shown on the plans. 10. The erosion control details shown are not the City Standard Plates. We can provide electronic copies of the City's details upon request. 11. The stub streets shown north and south of Robinson Drive will need to be constructed to project limits as part of these improvements. The current plans show them as future streets. 12. A detail for the house pads is required identifying the house styles, garage floor, low floor, etc. needs to be included with the plans. 13. A hold down detail must be included with the plans. Amended Utility Plan Comments: 1. The plan is not legible and needs to be re -done so that it is at least a 1 " =50' scale. 2. The plans do not include any numbering of the storm sewer structures. It is therefore impossible to review the storm sewer schedule against the proposed plans. 3. Profile views of all of the utilities must be included with the plans. 4. The location of valves and water services needs to be shown on the plans. 5. The structure numbering of the sanitary sewer is incorrect. There are two sanitary sewer manholes labeled MH61. In addition, the sanitary sewer schedule does not match what is shown on the plans. The above comments are not a comprehensive list of all the revisions that are necessary for this submittal. Due to the illegible font size and scale of the plans it is not possible to provide a S:\Advisory Boards & Commissions \Pluming & Zoning Board \Packetst2013 Packets'Llovember 13, 201315AW City Engineer Letter - 110613. doe