Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 11, 2009 <br />Page 6 <br />However, if a use ceases to exist for a year, then starting that use again would require <br />applications that include a public hearing. <br />The city wants to reinstitute the condition of approval that would ensure that all <br />conditions are being met and not causing issues with public welfare. A condition of <br />approval can require annual review. <br />Board members agreed that they want to see business survive in Lino Lakes. However, <br />there are currently problems with the existing business being located too close to homes <br />within a residential area. <br />Board members agreed that there is an existing impact to the neighborhood with the <br />existing business. They hope that the neighbors and business owner can continue to work <br />together and get through their issues with the current repair business on the site. <br />However, board members agreed that an expansion of the business would increase the <br />impacts to the neighborhood. They determined that this was not the appropriate location <br />for the proposed type of business. <br />In addition, board members pointed out that if this <br />would open up additional issues as to what future <br />Bess were approved but fails, this <br />ss could apply. <br />Ms. Brady made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment to change the land use designation from Low 1 'a''ty Sewered Residential <br />to Commercial at 909 Maple Street. Motion was supported y Mr. Hyden. Motion <br />carried 4 -0. <br />Mr. Hyden made a MOT <br />General Business at 909 <br />passed 4 -0. <br />i <br />to recommend denial of the Rezoning from Rural to <br />le Street. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion <br />Mr. Root'' madde a 1VIOTION to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for an <br />Outdoor Sales Lot, in order to allo the addition of automobile sales to an existing auto <br />repair shop located at 909 Maple =street. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion <br />carried 4 -0. <br />The Board informed the applicant that he can still pursue his application with the city <br />council if he so: chooses. <br />Mr. Halversen announced that he was displeased with staff and that he was uninformed <br />about the problems with his application. <br />VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. 2008 Year End Review <br />Mr. Smyser noted that enclosed in the board member meeting packets was a summary <br />of actions taken by the board in 2008. Mr. Smyser added that items approved <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />