My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2010 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2010
>
04/14/2010 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 4:48:29 PM
Creation date
6/27/2014 2:25:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2010
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Interim Use Permit <br />2209 Phelps Road <br />page 5 <br />Similarly, the current zoning ordinance includes "Earth Moving and Land Reclamation ". This is <br />allowed in all districts except that a conditional use permit is required when 5,000 cy or more is <br />to be removed or deposited. The ordinance states that inclusion of this permit process in the <br />ordinance does not automatically imply entitlement to such a permit. We have no record of a <br />conditional use permit being issued to the site for Earth Moving and Land Reclamation. <br />Communication towers like the one on the north parcel are allowed with a conditional use permit <br />in the LI zone. <br />It is not entirely clear just what activity on the site was allowed under the City's zoning <br />ordinances over time. No zoning district allowed the storing of materials and equipment <br />outdoors except by conditional use permit. As noted, there was the possibility of a conditional <br />use permit, but there is no record of any being granted. <br />Floodplain <br />The site is within an unnumbered A zone on the floodplain map. This means it likely is within <br />the floodplain, but the exact 100 -year flood elevation has never been determined. We have <br />various documents that have assumed different flood elevations on the site and in the area. The <br />differences are two feet or even more. The Rice Creek Watershed District is working with Arnt <br />representatives. It is likely that they will come to agreement on how to address this issue. The <br />recommended condition of approval is that the City accept the Watershed District's solution to <br />the puzzle. <br />Nonconforming Use Issues <br />A nonconforming use is a use that lawfully occupied a building or land on the effective date of <br />the zoning ordinance but that currently does not conform to the use regulations. Regulations <br />change over time as a community evolves. What conformed to a city's zoning regulations at one <br />time might not later in time after the regulations are amended. <br />It is documented that Arnt operated beginning in the 1970s. The nature of the activity there has <br />not changed. <br />On the north side of the road, Acton Construction began on the site in 1968. However, the <br />businesses and uses on that site have changed. The files include building permits and sign <br />permits for Acton Construction, Mr. Miller's company. However, there has been a Bobcat <br />equipment business there in the interim. That is, it appears that the site use has not been <br />construction material storage the entire time. At least one other use operated there for more than <br />one year. Therefore, the nonconforming use status expired, in accordance with the zoning <br />ordinance both in the 1970s and the current ordinance. The relevant passages are highlighted <br />below. The point is that the concept and intent of the "nonconforming" status has been <br />recognized for many years in the City's zoning ordinances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.