My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/10/2010 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2010
>
11/10/2010 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:51:14 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 12:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
11/10/2010
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 13, 2010 <br />Page 5 <br />an area of single family detached townhomes, which were considered marketable at the <br />time of initial development. Since then, the market has changed, and the city has <br />received a request from the builder and developer to re -plat in order to convert four of the <br />detached townhome lots to more typical single family detached lots. Staff explained that <br />this would require a revised plat application, and that city staff is supportive of the <br />request. <br />Staff explained that as single family lots, these would be smaller than a standard lot size. <br />However, the project is a Planned Unit Development that allowr a mix of life -cycle <br />housing types and the proposed lot sizes would be allowed. The number of dwelling <br />units would not change, and the homes themselves would be the same as the ones already <br />planned for the lots. <br />Staff added that the city will require that the Ho eras AssociatiOn is in agreement <br />with the pr p osed change an g prior or to an a pp lication submittal. <br />Staff was seeking comments from the board regarding this request. <br />Board member discussed the issue. Staff clarified that no specific architectural standards <br />were required for these particula?tmits. The City could require that architectural <br />standards for the single family homes are consistent with what currently exists in the <br />development. <br />Staff assured the board that this would not set a precederYt'to allow for small lots on <br />individual properties, as the purpose of a PUD is to allow for such changes. <br />The consensus of the board was that members were in favor of the change as proposed, <br />and did not see a problem with an application for request of such change. <br />VII. :IJOURN <br />Mr. Laden made a MOTION toadjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Motion was supported <br />by , lson. Moti' carried 5 - 0. <br />Respectfully sub <br />Dawn Bugge <br />Community Development Assistant <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.