01/12/2000 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • The documents and data files are vital to the environmental planning needs of Lino Lakes. We recommend that efforts be made to convey the information in these reports to City Staff and other boards. We look forward to helping the City of Lino Lakes work together to transform the information and ideals presented as a result of this effort into a better way of growth planning and environmental management in our community. The Environmental Board would like to thank the consultants for their diligence and perseverance during this project. We are extremely pleased with the product. We have officially accepted the final reports and we recommend approval by the City Council. Mr. Trehus made a motion to approve the above recommendation and forward to City Council, Ms. Frisk - Thompson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously. Environmental Board Initiatives Job Descriptions The Environmental Board added the phrase "and integrate conservation development principals in all types of development" after the last sentence, �,=� +, .e the period of number two on Essential Job Functions. Mr. Trehus mad 00 on to approve the job description and pass it on to Dan Tesch, Director of � stra "� Mr. Kukonen seconded the motion, motion passed unanimou Project Review Concrete Batch Plant Mr. Asleson introduced the t 3 . s = . ° ":sect: The Minnesota Department o portation will be resurfacing 35W between Sunset Drive and the Junction with hi erstate 35E during the period of time of approximately between April 17, 2000 and project completion time. Contract time is 61 working days. Temporary, portable concrete batch plants are needed to conform to MNDOT's specifications /limits for concrete placement within 30 minutes of production. The Tagg property was chosen for this site based on close proximity. Mr. Asleson stated he felt there should be a 100 -foot buffer to the East. He further stated he has brought this to the attention of Schafer Contracting and will coordinate with them on the issue in the spring. After discussion, the Environmental Board made the following recommendations: 1) Move site as far west as possible to avoid negative impacts on wetlands on eastern side of Tagg property. 2) Encourage staff to monitor project to ensure no negative environmental impacts and to ensure contractor complies with MPCA guidelines. Mr. Kukonen made a motion to approve the above recommendations, Ms. Frisk - Thompson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously.