My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
02/09/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:32:26 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 1:12:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2010
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 26, 2000 <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br />DNR Waters - Metro Region, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793 <br />Telephone: (651) 772 -7910 Fax: (651) 772 -7977 <br />Ms. Mary Kay Wyland <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 <br />RE: SETBACK VARIANCE, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, RESHANAU SHORES, CITY OF LINO <br />LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY <br />Dear Ms. Wyland: <br />I have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have the following comments. <br />It is the preference of the Department that setbacks are maximized for all new construction. It <br />doesn't appear that lake setbacks have been maximized on this proposal. The two adjustments <br />that seem most obvious are moving the deck to the side of the house and further reducing the <br />street setback. <br />It is difficult to compare the setbacks of the proposed structure with the existing structure on the <br />lot to the north (Lot 2), as the structure to the north is measured to the survey line, which is not a <br />reliable indicator of the location of the ordinary high water mark (elevation 883.5'). <br />I would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition <br />involving vegetation is placed on the variance. The shore impact zone (SIZ) should be <br />maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The SIZ is that area adjacent to the <br />lake equal to half of the required setback, or 50' in this case. This alone will help mitigate the <br />negative effects of the shorter setback by providing a more stabile lake edge than mowed lawn <br />(physically and biologically) and will help protect views from the lake. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />Tom Hovey <br />Area Hydrologist <br />DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 - 646 -6367 • TTY: 651 - 296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 <br />An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />Who Values Diversity <br />I Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a <br />•U Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.