My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/10/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
05/10/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:09:55 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 1:55:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
05/10/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 12, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />Mr. Johnson moved to close open mike at 6:36 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. <br />Motion carried 6 -0. <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br />A. David Pearson, 6280 Ware Road, Variance <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:37 p.m. <br />Staff advised that the applicant, David Pearson, has submitted an application for a <br />variance to allow a single family home at 6280 Ware Road to be located closer than the <br />required 40 feet from the property line on a collector roadway. The Ordinance requires a <br />minimum setback of 40 feet. The applicant has redesigned the proposed dwelling to <br />minimize the setback required which will be 30 feet at the north/west corner and 37.6 at <br />the south/west corner. The variance requested ranges from 2.4 feet to ten feet. This is the <br />only vacant lot in the area and contains wetlands which restrict the lot as well as the steep <br />grade on the easterly side. <br />Staff noted the criteria required for variance consi <br />fact. Staff advised this development has coven <br />value range and the applicant maintains the p <br />but would not meet that value criteria if th-, size <br />of the variance as requested. <br />and recommended findings of <br />whic `'' quire all homes within a <br />home meets that value as proposed <br />duced. Staff recommends approval <br />Chair Schaps asked if comments w d u v� from neighboring property owners. Ms. <br />Wyland stated notices were not se � o ��rrounding property owners. The <br />Metropolitan Council owns t > north and a single family residence is on the <br />east side of the wetland. <br />Mr. Johnson suggested more care e given to grading plans to assure a sufficient building <br />site. He stated he is unsure what occurred on this site. Ms. Wyland concurred with the <br />need for care and to take a closer look at that aspect. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked about the actual elevations of the site. He noted it appears the garage <br />entrance is from the Coyote Trail side. Ms. Wyland stated that is correct and noted the <br />grading plan which indicates the elevations of the site. <br />Mr. Rafferty inquired regarding the mention of a setback of 7.5 feet from the back of the <br />house. Ms. Wyland stated that measures the distance from the drainage easement, there is <br />no required setback.. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if this particular plan had been before the Planning and Zoning Board <br />previously. Ms. Wyland stated it has not been. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.