My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/14/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
06/14/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:04:27 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 2:06:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/14/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The residential lot size should determine the number of trees that can be planted <br />and any reasonable net loss in extreme cases will be more than made up for with <br />minimum tree requirements for non wooded lots. <br />III -C - Other Ordinances <br />Required replacement tree plantings may be used to satisfy other requirements on private <br />property, which means the net loss would be carried forward to areas off site. This should not be <br />necessary if a minimum of trees are required on non wooded lots. Boulevard tree planting <br />required of the developer should be included in the minimum tree requirement. <br />IV -1 -B - Submission Requirements - The size, species, condition and location of all existing <br />significant trees and woodlands. <br />The preliminary planning stage should include a reasonable and thorough estimate of existing <br />trees until further design is accomplished. Excessive inventory may be required of areas that <br />would not be impacted by development. <br />IV -C -1 <br />The amount of security is excessive and totally unnecessary. A 100 lot development planting 7 <br />trees per lot, or 700 trees, would require a letter of credit for $262,500.00, permit fees of <br />$100,000.00, cash fees for city and approximately $175,000.00 for the cost and planting of trees. <br />Please reconsider the implication of this security. A 100% performance bond and estimated cash <br />fees paid for by the developer should more that satisfy your requirements. <br />VI -A -2 - Compliance <br />Replacement trees in residential areas within 6 months of site construction is not possible. <br />Additional time should be allowed, after construction of the home, to the developer to work with <br />the city forester, builder and homeowner to locate planting areas, select species, and allow <br />nurturing necessary for survival. <br />In closing, because of the importance and long term ramifications to the property owners and <br />citizens of Lino Lakes, I am asking the City Council to please allow more time for the staff and <br />Planning Commission to review comments, including my own, from other property owners. The <br />staff and Planning Commission should research, review and analyze other community tree <br />ordinances in an attempt not to compromise, but simplify and reduce future administration costs. <br />is ordinance shou . be governed by reason and not become a barrier to future planning. <br />Thank you, <br />Richaa Carls <br />RSC:ce <br />cc: Marty Asleson, Brian Wessel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.