My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/09/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
08/09/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 10:44:33 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 3:19:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
08/09/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Marmon Keystone <br />August 9, 2000 <br />page 3 <br />and the unsold property to the west is interrelated. Because of this, the design and review <br />of these two sites requires coordination. <br />The City Engineer's memo addresses these issues further. <br />• Parking <br />For light manufacturing, our code requires at least one parking space per 2000 sf of gross <br />floor area or one space per employee, whichever is greater. The office area requires 3 <br />spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the <br />ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />• Roads, Access, Circulation <br />Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared <br />driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab <br />and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be <br />necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition <br />of approval. <br />In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the <br />driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the <br />driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo <br />Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. <br />A public roadway segment is proposed on the west side of the site. This would be about <br />230 ft. of road with a cul de sac. This road provides for trucks to circulate around the <br />site. In addition, the road will provide access to future parcels in the undeveloped area on <br />the west of the Marmon Keystone site. This road will be constructed to City standards <br />and will require a developer's agreement like other development projects involving <br />public roads. This can be part of the agreement for tax increment financing. <br />gross <br />area <br />90% <br />code <br />requirement <br />required <br />spaces <br />total footprint <br />19,200 sf <br />office <br />2,048 sf <br />1843 <br />3 plus <br />one space per 200 sf <br />12 <br />mfg /warehouse <br />81,000 sf <br />72,900 <br />one space per 2000 sf <br />36 <br />TOTAL <br />48 <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />• Roads, Access, Circulation <br />Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared <br />driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab <br />and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be <br />necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition <br />of approval. <br />In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the <br />driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the <br />driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo <br />Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. <br />A public roadway segment is proposed on the west side of the site. This would be about <br />230 ft. of road with a cul de sac. This road provides for trucks to circulate around the <br />site. In addition, the road will provide access to future parcels in the undeveloped area on <br />the west of the Marmon Keystone site. This road will be constructed to City standards <br />and will require a developer's agreement like other development projects involving <br />public roads. This can be part of the agreement for tax increment financing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.