My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/13/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
09/13/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 10:27:39 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 3:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/13/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 9, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />No one was present for Open Mike. <br />Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:34 p.m., and was supported by <br />Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />Due to staff involvement at a Council worksession, Chair Schaps explained that Items F <br />and G would be considered first. Once staff was available, Item A would be considered. <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br />F. PUBLIC HEARING (Continuation), Town Center Development Standards <br />Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 7:35 p.m. <br />Staff noted the Planning & Zoning Board opened the public hearing on the new standards <br />at the April meeting and kept it open to allow extensive discussion and public input. No <br />additional developers have expressed an interest in presenting information. The <br />Economic Development Advisory Committee met o gust 3, 2000 for further <br />discussion of the proposed standards and voted on ommendation. Staff advised <br />that their recommended revisions have been inc orate was explained that due to <br />the application for grant funds, it is now nece further the Town Center project. <br />Staff recommended the Board adopt the a dorse M w t statement as outlined in the staff <br />report. Staff explained that once the stan e dorsed, the Metropolitan Council <br />will be so advised and the grant funds qu . taff noted the revisions have been <br />identified in the standards by strike u rlined wording as well as the inclusion of <br />an index of revisions made. . <br />Mr. Corson asked if the are <br />Smyser stated that is correct, t <br />changed. <br />have not changed from the initial discussion. Mr. <br />boundaries of the Town Center have not been <br />Mr. Corson noted a previous presentation related to integration of housing densities and <br />asked if that would be implemented on the north side as well. Mr. Smyser presented a <br />map of the Town Center and noted the language revision from a restrictive statement on <br />the Land Use Plan to indicate the boundaries shown on the land use plan are approximate <br />and that as long as the development conforms to the regulating plan, boundaries may <br />change based on detailed site analysis. Mr. Smyser identified the land area that was <br />included in the concept submitted for the Livable Communities Grant. He noted the <br />overall residential densities will need to be maintained, however, the boundaries of those <br />densities are flexible. <br />Mr. Corson asked if the grant would apply to the entire area. Mr. Smyser pointed out the <br />southern area where the grant would be focused and stated he is unsure if those funds <br />could be transferred to the northern area. <br />Mr. Zych reviewed the language revision on Page 12 and asked if the bank and clinic <br />were included in the Highway Commercial zone. Mr. Smyser pointed out the location of <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.