My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/13/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
09/13/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 10:27:39 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 3:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/13/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM VI A <br />• <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />P & Z MEETING DATE: September 13, 2000 <br />TOPIC: Discussion Item: <br />Meeting Schedule, Project Review Process, Reports <br />BACKGROUND <br />It is a good idea to periodically revisit the City's process for reviewing development <br />proposals. A member of the P & Z has asked about the schedule for staff reports and <br />delivery to the P & Z. This is a good opportunity to review the whole process. <br />I've attached the Application Deadline and Meeting Schedule. Several things influenced <br />this schedule. It must accommodate the meetings of citizen advisory boards, each of <br />which have different schedules. It also must accommodate the state law governing the <br />timeframe allowed to the City for reviewing applications. The schedule also must allow <br />enough time to research, negotiate changes, and write a complete report on the project. <br />The deadlines are keyed to the P & Z meetings. Previous to 1999, the application <br />deadlines were only three weeks before the P & Z meetings. We found that this often did <br />not allow enough time to prepare even minimal information or analysis for the <br />Environmental Board. We did two things to address this. One, we moved the deadline <br />back to four weeks before the P & Z meeting. Two, we changed the Environmental <br />Board meeting schedule from the fourth Wednesday to the last Wednesday of the month. <br />We also decided to stretch the time between the P & Z recommendation meeting and the <br />City Council meeting. Instead of going to the very next City Council meeting, we skip <br />one. This allows the applicant the opportunity to resolve outstanding issues that P & Z <br />may include as conditions of approval. Often, there are engineering issues that should be <br />resolved before Council approval but can be addressed between the P & Z meeting and <br />the Council meeting. This is particularly relevant to commercial /industrial site plans. In <br />the interest of meeting economic development goals, we like to keep projects moving <br />along if possible. However, you have seen that if there is a serious unresolved issue, staff <br />will recommend delaying the P & Z approval. <br />State law allows the City 60 days to approve a project. This means between the date of a <br />complete application submittal and approval by City Council. With proper notice, we <br />can extend this an additional 60 days. We automatically add this 60 -day extension to <br />accommodate our meeting schedule. Our new application form notifies the applicant that <br />we are doing so. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.