11/08/2000 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 5 • Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification regarding the location of the parcels. Staff referred to a map indicating each parcel. • • Mr. Rafferty asked how the development works with the current Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Comprehensive Plan. Staff advised the area is currently guided for commercial but is zoned general business. There are some places in the City that the current Comprehensive Plan does not match up with the zoning map. Those areas need to be reviewed and cleared up. Mr. Rafferty stated the plan is a good plan. He expressed concern regarding the City making errors in spot development. There are townhomes, the Air Park, and a lot of residential in this area. He stated he is uncomfortable with the location of the building. He noted the area north of Elm is all commercial. Mr. Johnson stated the site backs up to Outlot B that is part of the Sea Plane. He asked what effect this development may have on the development of the outlot. Staff advised the outlot contains drainage and utility easements. Mr. Johnson clarified that a portion of Outlot B is happen to the remainder if it is ever developed. down that area. The property cannot be devel south. He asked what will d part of the runway goes The City Engineer added he also believes not be developed. Mr. Johnson asked if the 7/1 stand fairly tall. e in this case. He noted the building is The City Engineer advised t ommonly used for take off and landing. The land is not adjacent to this building. Mr. Schilling asked if someone will be living in the building on the second floor. Mr. Craig Miller, representative for Muller -Beis Funeral Home, came forward and stated in the course of this type of business, it is common to have an apprentice that lives on site. The apartment will be utilized for a person in training. Mr. Corson stated the primary concern is health and safety of the runway. He asked if the building will be on the side of the taxiway going uphill. Mr. Miller advised the owners are comfortable with the location. An extensive land search was done. He asked how much time is needed for the City to review a shared driveway agreement. The City Engineer advised conditions of approval include revisions of several plans. The report would have to be completed by next Wednesday to appear on the October 23, 2000 Council agenda. There is not enough time to review all the revisions.