Laserfiche WebLink
EIFS News Articles httpJ /www.eifsinfo.net/eifs- news.htm <br />Real Times April 2, 1999 <br />Crumbling Walls Creating A Stir by Dena Amoruso <br />46 If you were among the thousands who watched a recent Sunday night episode of "Dateline NBC ", you <br />may have caught an eye - opening report called "Is your home crumbling around you ?" I can see how this <br />report can create quite a stir in both new home buyers as well as new home builder's minds. It will, no <br />doubt, prompt buyers to ask questions about the type of stucco being used on homes they may be <br />interested in, and builders to re- examine some of their building products' representations from the <br />manufacturer. <br />The stucco referred to in this program is a synthetic type with the trade name of "EIFS ", or Exterior <br />Insulating and Finish Systems. Although EIFS costs about the same as brick or wood sidings (no <br />reference was made to its price comparison with real, or cement stucco), the manufacturer touts it as a <br />'lightweight, low maintenance exterior that provides an easy insulation system for a home." <br />It is this easy insulation system, however, that seems to be at the root of this investigation. Brought to the <br />attention of "Dateline" by homeowners in a traditionally wet geographical area (Vancouver, and <br />Wilmington, N.C.), the complaint was that their synthetic stucco -faced exterior walls apparently <br />contained rotting wood from the material's inability to drain moisture. <br />The program then decided to test homes in areas of traditionally more moderate rainfall, to see if the <br />same testing results would occur. A special probe was used to penetrate the wall of a three - year -old <br />synthetic stucco home in the Washington, D.C. suburb of Great Falls, VA. Evidently the same rotten <br />results were determined. <br />•The manufacturer was clearly in denial throughout the entire program, blaming the rotted timbers on <br />improperly installed windows, leaky roofs, and shoddy construction practices. <br />The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), representing over 60,000 home builders nation <br />wide, told Dateline that synthetic stucco, even if it meticulously applied and maintained, "Isn't compatible <br />with the existing wood frame construction methods in the United States." They went on to say that <br />homes with synthetic stucco "develops moisture intrusion problems even when properly constructed <br />according to industry standards" <br />• <br />If you are a recent buyer of a home with a stucco exterior and are not sure what type was used, call your <br />new home builder for clarification. If you decide to get the house inspected or tested for moisture within <br />the walls as this program demonstrated , and the results are positive, you may have a structural warranty <br />issue with your builder. (Many states require a 10 -year warranty on structure for their newly built homes) <br />If you are shopping for a new home, ask questions about the type of stucco being used and how it is <br />"wrapped ". Some builders go the extra mile (beyond industry standards and exceeding pre -set codes) to <br />ensure their new homes' structural integrity. This lessens their likelihood of structural defect litigation, <br />and creates "raving fans" by constantly trying to "raise the bar" by which new homes are being built. <br />Programs such as this "Dateline" report can bring apparent deficiencies such as those mentioned with <br />synthetic stucco to light, and may effect needed change. Dena Amorosa is a 13 year veteran in residential builder - developer <br />sales and marketing in both Northern and Southern California. She currently writes a weekly column and feature stories on new home construction and <br />sales issues for the Sacramento Bee, and is Marketing Services Director for The Advantage Group of Sacramento. She can be reached by e-mail at: <br />1 %I2rr ;rdl a0/.con, <br />C Copyright 1999 by EIFSinfo.net <br />All rights reserved. <br />9 of 10 1/9/2001 9:42 PM <br />