My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/14/2007 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
02/14/2007 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 11:06:10 AM
Creation date
7/1/2014 1:03:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/14/2007
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comforts of Home <br />page 4 <br />Hodgson Road /Co. Rd. J Master Plan: The City has been preparing a study of the <br />land and infrastructure around the intersection of Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and County <br />Road J (Ash Street). The goal is a planning document that will be adopted by the City <br />Council as the guide for development of the area by incorporating it into the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. This action is on the February 12 City Council agenda. <br />The Master Plan establishes a framework for the area and includes a number of planning <br />objectives to guide development. The objectives address infrastructure and design <br />elements for the area. The location of accesses on Hodgson and Co. Rd. J is one of the <br />most important pieces of the framework. The objectives describe specific locations for <br />access points as well as circulation needs and some specific elements of the framework, <br />which are illustrated on the Master Plan graphic. Individual aspects of the proposed <br />project are compared to the Master Plan under the respective headings below. <br />Growth Management: The Growth Management Policy (Ordinance No. 24 -04) <br />limits the number of dwelling units that can be approved for platting annually. There are <br />66 units committed for 2007 already, leaving 81 for this year. The policy does not <br />distinguish between types of dwelling units. <br />A question arises about whether or not all the units in the proposed project are to be <br />counted the same way that single family homes and townhomes are counted under the <br />growth policy. If so, the proposal includes a total of 131 dwelling units, and a phasing <br />plan is needed with a target maximum of 50 for each phase. Therefore the policy would <br />allow one of the unit types to be constructed each year for three years (48 condos in the <br />four buildings, the 41 senior apartments in their building, or the 42 assisted living units in <br />their building). <br />An alternative is to consider the assisted living units building as an institutional facility <br />rather than a dwelling unit building. This would remove the 42 assisted living "units" <br />from the growth management policy restrictions, leaving 89 condo and apartment units <br />that are subject to the growth policy. A two -phase plan would be needed under this <br />scenario. <br />However the project is broken down, the subdivision ordinance requires that all <br />preliminary plats include a phasing plan. <br />Density: It is difficult to calculate residential density on this project for several <br />reasons. There are three very different types of dwelling units on two separate lots. The <br />48 condominium units, labeled "townhomes" on the plan, are on Lot 2, which has about <br />3.4 acres of upland. This calculates out to about 14 units per acre for that lot. <br />The 41 senior apartments and the 42 assisted living units both sit on Lot 1, which <br />comprises about four acres. This calculates to about 20 units per acre if all the units are <br />counted as dwelling units the same way. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.