My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/12/2007 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
12/12/2007 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2014 3:43:22 PM
Creation date
7/2/2014 12:21:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2007
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Main Street Village <br />page 3 <br />• The Wetland/Aquatic and Upland Habitats map (AUAR Fig. 10 -2) does not show any core or <br />outlier habitat areas that we want to preserve. <br />• <br />Water quality, stormwater management, erosion and sedimentation: The AUAR <br />includes analyses of surface water runoff issues which lead to requirements for including <br />infiltration elements and other techniques. It also includes estimated stormwater management <br />recommendations for specific development areas. These estimates in the AUAR cannot be <br />considered strict requirements. However, they do provide guidance for mitigation. The <br />mitigation plan establishes sizing criteria for stormwater management areas that are designed <br />to support wetland complexes or large infiltrating surfaces with native plant populations. The <br />approach is that these areas would be designed consistent with strict criteria for maximum <br />filtration and/or infiltration of stormwater. <br />The site is labeled development area Y -TD in the AUAR. The most general estimate suggests <br />that 16 % -20% of the developable area would be needed for stormwater management (AUAR <br />Fig. 17 -3). A somewhat more refined estimate suggests a need of 5 acres for stormwater <br />management (AUAR Table 17 -5). These estimates are calculated for the entire 28 -acre site <br />and are high compared to standard development practices. The submitted project only <br />includes about a third of the total site (less than 9 of the 28 acres), so it is difficult to compare <br />against the AUAR. Nonetheless, we can see that stormwater treatment is a challenging issues <br />and it is important to consider the entire site rather than individual pieces. <br />While those stormwater management areas are estimates and not mandatory, the AUAR does <br />include specific requirements. Runoff rates must be at or below pre - development conditions. <br />This is a standard requirement everywhere in the city, enforced on all projects. The AUAR <br />also requires that runoff volume must be no more that 150% of pre - development runoff. The <br />AUAR also requires that stormwater management areas have a 6:1 slope rather than the <br />normal, steeper slope. These are being reviewed by the City Engineer. <br />Archaeological Survey: A Phase 1 cultural resources survey was completed for <br />the site and submitted with the project, as required by the AUAR. The farmstead site was <br />found to be not eligible for historic listing. The survey investigators recommend that no <br />further cultural resources work is necessary. <br />AUAR Fee and Environmental Review: The City Council adopted a fee for new <br />development within the AUAR area. This fee was based on the cost of the AUAR and <br />calculated by anticipating that growth will occur first in the Stage 1 and 2 growth areas. The <br />fee is $269 per acre, and 28.3 acres x $269 results in a fee of $7612. The fee goes toward the <br />costs of preparing the AUAR and is justified because no environmental review is needed for <br />projects within the AUAR area as long as the projects are consistent with the development <br />assumptions in the AUAR. <br />If the AUAR had not been prepared, the standard environmental review rules would apply. <br />The submittal includes about 37,000 sf. A retail commercial project of 200,000 sf or more <br />• would require an EAW. It is possible though unlikely that development of the full site would <br />cross that threshold. However, the City would have the ability to require an EAW if there <br />may be the potential for significant environmental effect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.