Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />If formally adopted by the RCWD Board, the RMP and this rule would govern <br />impacts from land disturbances, including wetland filling, excavation and <br />draining, within the RMP area. Regulation of wetland impacts under this rule <br />would be in place of the general terms of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation <br />Act (WCA). The rule would apply only to the geographic area in the City of Lino <br />Lakes encompassed by the RMP, as represented in Figure 1 of the proposed <br />rule. It is also intended that components of the RMP will be incorporated into <br />the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Section 404 permit evaluations as a means to <br />achieve a higher level of permitting consistency. <br />Background. The permitting process described in the rule would replace <br />individual permitting under existing RCWD Rules C (stormwater management) <br />and F (wetland alteration). A single application would be submitted in which all <br />stormwater and wetland impacts would be considered and addressed. <br />The RMP assesses the role that water and related natural resources play within <br />the RMP area. This assessment is used to develop an approach to managing <br />surface resources and public drainage systems consistent with the Lino Lakes <br />planning and regulatory framework. The RCWD's RMP effort follows from Lino <br />Lakes comprehensive land use planning. The goal is to provide for the surface <br />hydrology that will serve existing, continuing and anticipated new land uses for <br />the foreseeable future without injuring the natural hydrological system of the <br />watershed or the functions it provides. <br />The most substantial difference from the RCWD's general permitting rules is the <br />framework to determine wetland replacement obligations when wetlands are <br />filled or drained for development. Because the RMP rests on the RCWD's <br />assessment of the role that wetland areas play in the overall health of the <br />subwatershed, the replacement requirements create significant incentives to <br />direct unavoidable wetland impacts to wetlands that play a Tess important <br />watershed role, and to direct required wetland replacement and preservation to <br />areas in which the functioning of the hydrologic system will be best enhanced. <br />Because the watershed -based approach recognizes the role of the riparian edge <br />in the hydrologic system, replacement credit also is offered for preservation or <br />enhancement of wetland buffer and habitat area. <br />RCWD Rule RMP -3 <br />SONAR Letter <br />October 23, 2008 <br />2 <br />