Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />review and permit issuance. The intent is to reduce landowner cost and improve <br />the efficiency of both state and federal wetland permitting. <br />Once wetland impact is justified, obligations to replace affected wetland acreage <br />and function are determined in a manner similar to that under WCA. The <br />methodology to determine wetland impacts and replacement requirements, <br />however, reflects the extensive assessment the RCWD has done of the surface <br />hydrologic systems within the RMP area. <br />The extent of wetland replacement required will be greatly influenced by the <br />locations of wetland impact and replacement in relation to the higher priority <br />wetland within the area referred to as Wetland Preservation Corridor (WPC). <br />Figure 1 of Rule RMP -3 delineates the WPC at a regional scale. WPC is defined <br />in the rule as contiguous wetland community with high vegetative integrity <br />determined using accepted wetland functional assessment methods, as well as <br />other wetland meeting this criterion that is within 50 feet of the contiguous <br />wetland area. <br />The regional scale WPC is a starting point. As part of an application, a <br />landowner will be required to identify initial, "normal" WPC boundaries more <br />precisely by performing a vegetative integrity assessment at a parcel scale. The <br />boundaries determined, therefore, may be narrower in places, or more <br />expansive in places, than the boundaries shown on Figure 1. As a result of the <br />landowner's wetland impact and replacement decisions reflected in the <br />approved project design, and possibly as a result of other project consequences <br />such as hydrology changes, the WPC boundaries at the close of project activity <br />may differ from the initial WPC boundaries. In this case, the landowner will be <br />required to prepare and submit a final WPC map. <br />Impacts to wetland within a WPC must be replaced at a higher acreage ratio than <br />impacts outside of a WPC. Similarly, replacement within a WPC receives a higher <br />acreage credit than replacement that is not. This approach is intended to <br />protect and enhance those wetland and riparian resources that lie within a <br />contiguous corridor of existing and restorable wetlands with the potential to <br />provide high function and public value. <br />RCWD Rule RMP -3 <br />SONAR Letter <br />October 23, 2008 <br />4 <br />