My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/19/2008 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2008
>
11/19/2008 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:45:20 PM
Creation date
7/3/2014 10:41:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
11/19/2008
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a public agency permittee could choose to execute a maintenance agreement in <br />place of a recorded declaration. <br />Within the buffer, a property owner generally would not be permitted to mow <br />vegetation, engage in cultivation or pasturing, apply fertilizer or engage in <br />similar disturbances. However, a property owner could engage in periodic <br />cutting, remove diseased and invasive species, and otherwise manage the buffer <br />in accordance with a written plan approved by RCWD staff. Structures and hard <br />surface would be prohibited within the buffer and habitat area, as would filling <br />and excavating. The proposed rule contains limited exceptions for suspended <br />structures, public utilities, stormwater management features and trails for non - <br />motorized use. <br />The proposed rule also would allow a buffer to be regraded if done in <br />accordance with certain conditions. These include rigorous erosion control; <br />preservation of wooded buffer and canopy trees; a design that when <br />implemented enhances sheet flow and improves buffer function; a revegetation <br />plan establishing primarily native vegetation; and a three -year maintenance <br />obligation. <br />Stormwater Management. The existing requirements of RCWD Rule C largely <br />will apply. The chief difference is a specific focus on restoration and use of <br />natural wetland systems, without impact on the ecological function of those <br />systems, to limit and help manage runoff volume increases as the subwatershed <br />develops. <br />Activity meeting any of the three criteria listed in bullets on page 3 of this letter <br />would need to meet stormwater requirements. Rule C exempts from stormwater <br />requirements work on Tots smaller than one acre (industrial, commercial, <br />institutional or multi -unit residential development) or five acres (single - family <br />residential development), as well as single - family house construction. These <br />exceptions would not apply under Rule RMP -3. <br />Both Rule C and Rule RMP -3 require, for water quality and stormwater volume <br />control purposes, infiltration or retention on -site of the runoff within the <br />contributing area from a 2.8 -inch rainfall (two -year event). RMP -3 requires that <br />0.5- inches of this be achieved by reestablishing drained wetland, restoring <br />7 <br />RCWD Rule RMP -3 <br />SONAR Letter <br />October 23, 2008 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.