Laserfiche WebLink
ANOKA <br />L <br />CHISAGO <br />66____I I <br />r, 1 6. rP14 <br />Approximate i -,. ° I T , ai <br />City of Lino Lakes :1 Columbus ir <br />Boundary `� <br />i <br />_r' <br />r_I <br />r' <br />i., <br />r' <br />1 <br />a1 <br />PI <br />Spring Lake Pareri <br />ti I�Mounds View <br />! I Brine <br />1 <br />Forest lake <br />x} <br />kl <br />F <br />Wya <br />kes <br />Aran HUM <br />\1 L <br />1 r <br />Columbia eg0t f <br />I. I <br />im eeet nelson <br />P ►4 <br />HENNEPIN <br />rt <br />Roseville <br />RAMSEY <br />111 whir Bea. <br />• 1 Bellwood <br />`I <br />I <br />Ir <br />PI f <br />White <br />Birchwood w <br />Pine Springs <br />WASHINGTON <br />Legend <br />Political Boundary <br />1t County Boundary <br />ail Infiltration Not Recommended <br />Sou <br />Ace creek watershed DisInc, <br />Emmons a ORVkr! Tran Resources, Inc <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />Minnesota Gedngrcal Survey <br />Mnnesote Department of Hearth <br />Disclaimer: The polygons shown on this map are Interwee <br />for use at a wetershed.scale Site specific inrormaeon <br />(e.g. well data, proposed land use, emergency spill <br />contaminant protocol availability, etc.) should be reviewer, <br />and considered in these areas when making a fine' <br />deteminadon as to whether Infiltration is ultimately <br />appropriate fora given site <br />0 1.25 2 5 <br />I 1 I <br />5 Miles <br />H <br />v <br />Figure 10. Areas not recommended for infiltration [from RCWD 2009 Groundwater Planning & Mgt. <br />Program] <br />City of Lino Lakes SWMP 1 February 8, 2013 Draft 1 22 <br />