Laserfiche WebLink
SHEP, a new model for water quality assessment: <br />• Monitors the health of valuable water resources <br />• Uses research -based multiple index metrics <br />• Professionally trains adult volunteers <br />• Utilizes multiple levels of quality control to ensure quality results <br />• Provides relevant, reliable data to local decision makers <br />• Engages citizens in water resource management and assessment <br />• Promotes water resource health to community members <br />• Promotes partnership between local governments, state agencies and community <br />residents. <br />1.2 Rice Creek SHEP <br />SHEP was first implemented in a pilot phase into the Rice Creek Watershed District in <br />the summer and fall of 2006. In 2012 SHEP was led by Friends of the Mississippi River <br />(FMR) in partnership with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and Fortin Consulting. Local program partners <br />included the Anoka Conservation District, University of Minnesota Water Resource <br />Center, City of Lino Lakes, City of Centerville, Anoka County Parks, The Wargo Nature <br />Center, and local landowners. <br />Primary funding for this program was made possible by the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. Matching resources for the 2012 SHEP season were provided by Friends of the <br />Mississippi River. <br />The program recruited 30 adult volunteers organized in three teams to monitor a total of <br />nine sites in the fall of 2012. These sites were located in Hardwood Creek, Clearwater <br />Creek, Rice Creek, and the inlet /outlet of Locke Lake. Some sites were chosen in part to <br />gauge the effects of recent restoration and stewardship activity. For more information on <br />site selection, see section 4.0. <br />The SHEP monitoring protocol was divided into two sections: a physical habitat <br />assessment and a biological assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates. Volunteers <br />participated in 1.5 days of training, covering the in- stream physical assessment and <br />macroinvertebrate collection methods, and laboratory macroinvertebrate identification <br />procedures. For more information on site selection, see section 2.0. <br />Each volunteer team collected physical assessment data and benthic macroinvertebrate <br />samples at each site. In addition, each team also cross - checked one site sampled by <br />another team. This was done to improve overall sampling quality and monitor <br />standardized sampling methodology. <br />After macroinvertebrate collection was completed, volunteers participated in laboratory <br />analysis sessions to identify samples. The samples were later cross - checked by <br />macroinvertebrate identification professionals at Fortin Consulting, and results were <br />reported to program partners, local governments and made available to the general public. <br />