My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/27/2004 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2004 Park Board Packets
>
10/27/2004 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 11:52:54 AM
Creation date
7/9/2014 9:02:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/27/2004
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Board Meeting - May 3, 2004 <br />Minutes <br />• Mr. Black stated the lots are approximately 25,000 -sq. ft. with <br />wetlands. The lots are approximately 15,000 -sq. ft. when the <br />wetlands are removed. <br />• <br />Rick referred to the current Parks and Trails Map pointing out <br />existing trails in the area of the proposed development. <br />Chair Lindy suggested connecting via trails the development to <br />existing trails. <br />Mr. Black stated there is a problem with getting trails along <br />backyards without affecting the wetlands. Also, the trails would <br />not go anywhere. He offered the possibility of constructing a <br />sidewalk to provide an off -road access to the trails. <br />It was the consensus of the Park Board that there would not be a <br />significant value to only provide a trail loop within the <br />development. <br />Paul stated it would be better to have trails along the roadway <br />to connect to the existing trails. <br />Katie stated access to another park area, existing trails and a <br />sidewalk would be more valuable. <br />Paul suggested a trail be constructed parallel with Fox Road <br />along with a cash dedication to satisfy the park dedication fee. <br />Rick stated he does not see long term how a sidewalk would <br />provide access. The options include retaining Parcel B along <br />with a loop trail that would provide future access to other <br />trails or require a 100% cash dedication. <br />Mr. Black stated this is an opportunity for the City to provide <br />future access. That future access should be planned for now. <br />The Environmental Board was adamant about open space on an upland <br />area. <br />Aaron stated he is concerned that the City will miss an <br />opportunity for a future trail connection to the north and east. <br />Paul stated he believes a cash dedication would be more <br />beneficial than marginally useable land. <br />The majority of the Park Board suggested the developer develop <br />Parcel B and recommend 100% cash dedication for the park <br />dedication fee. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.