Laserfiche WebLink
• Blaine Park Board doesn't bite on dog park site <br />• <br />Wednesday, 29 April 2009 <br />by Tim Hennagir <br />Life Editor <br />Blaine Park Board commissioners still aren't biting on the idea of partially using a Lexington Avenue <br />open space parcel for a long debated city -owned dog park or off -leash dog exercise area. <br />The board revisited the dog park development issue <br />for the second straight month Tuesday night. <br />In March, commissioners reviewed the city's history <br />of previous dog park proposals. <br />During that meeting, Kappelhoff reminded the board <br />the topic had been discussed extensively several years <br />ago, but never reached city council members in <br />recommendation form. <br />Possible use of open space was mentioned as one <br />option for dog park development. The issue was <br />subsequently discussed at a joint council -park board <br />meeting April i6. <br />During the April meeting, recently purchased open <br />space property at 1198o Lexington was mentioned as <br />a suitable site for a proposed dog park because it had <br />favorable features. <br />Kappelhoff said approximately three to five acres of <br />the parcel could be used for a dog park. Space would <br />be available for a parking lot, which could be accessed <br />off of Lexington Avenue. <br />Council members voiced support for continuing dog <br />park development, Kappelhoff said. Park board <br />members wanted to review a League of Minnesota <br />Cities (LMC) position paper. <br />This map shows the location of a <br />proposed io -acre site for a dog park <br />or off -leash dog excerise area near <br />Lexington Avenue in Blaine. <br />Approximately three to five acres of <br />the parcel could be used for a dog <br />park. Space would be available for a <br />parking lot, which could be accessed <br />off of Lexington Avenue.(Map <br />Graphic Courtesy City of Blaine) <br />According to Kappelhoff, the LMC's risk management division had advised against developing dog <br />parks because of possible liability and neighborhood impact issues. <br />However, the LMC's revised position leans favorably toward development, stating dog parks have not <br />proven to be a significant source of complaints or public risk, Kappelhoff said. <br />