My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/13/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
01/13/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 1:07:05 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:25:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/13/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Elm Street <br />Rochelle Casey <br />Mark Selchow <br />59 Elm Street <br />Lino Lakes, t1N 55014 <br />James E. Studenski,.P.E. <br />Lino Lakes City Engineer <br />Dear Mr. Studenski, <br />We are writing this letter in response to the proposed <br />recanstru.tion of Elm Street between Lake Driue and Sunset in <br />Lino Lakes_ This project, as portrayed tows, is something, <br />Rochelle and L are vehemently opposed to. <br />Drainage ditches aad pedestrian walkways were just put <br />in a few years age. During the construction of the walkway, my <br />sprinkI'er system was destroyed'. Furthermore, with the walkway <br />now in its current location, it cuts-off about 1/3 of my Front <br />yard. This past sunnier., we spent close to $1,.500.9e dollars to <br />repair damages sustained from the walkway installation_ Please <br />don't think that .I felt like putting that much money into <br />repairing something the city destroyed., just to rip it back out <br />again? <br />The last paint we wish to make is the new road itself, <br />and what issues this brings to the neighborhood, Hawing lived <br />in a neighborhood in the past that had a new road put in, our <br />biggest concern is SAFTEY? Newer, wider roads bring two things <br />along with them. One; vehicles travelling at a higher rate of <br />speed, and two; potential danger for the children of our <br />neighborhood. Elm. Street already has a respectable uolume of <br />traffic due to the schools, church and • access to shopping. <br />Pedestrians,; mostly children are quite numerous on a daily <br />basis. adding width and new surfacing to this road at this <br />tine would be like pouring gasoline on a Fire to put it out? <br />It just is net fathomable.. <br />PLEASE reconsider this proposal For the reconstruction <br />of Elm Street. Tt is our opinion that we share the same <br />feelings as many other residents of our lovely neighborhood.. <br />i d S <br />.Sincerely, <br />Rochelle & Nark <br />Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.